Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 09-13-2022, 12:23 PM
cyxthryth cyxthryth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
no valid arguments
As I have already stated to you multiple times, this is intended to be a civil discussion - not an argument. Why are you (seemingly) trying to simply argue instead of engage in civil discussion by backing up your position with relevant, factual data or evidence? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
OP agrees I am not moving the goalposts, since his post was general. There is nothing that says you can't have a pocket cleric.
Your post would seem to betray that you are aware that you have moved goalposts, because you are now attempting (disingenuously) to validate said goalpost-moving by stating that it is objectively true that the OP's post "is general" and that this somehow means "you are not moving the goalposts" by changing the basis of the discussion (from being about 4 priests/casters, to being about 4 priests/casters plus X amount of pocket Clerics, or other pocket classes). It is not objectively true that you are "not moving the goalposts" just because you and OP both agree that the OP's post "was general" and that that somehow means "you are not moving the goalposts". That is simply you - laughably - claiming you (and OP) are correct due to argumentum ad populum hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] This really isn't hard.

Please clarify what you mean by stating OP's post "was general"? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Since we seem to be assuming the players are experienced, I see no reason why a pocket cleric is a difficult thing to use.
The problem is that your post would seem to indicate that you believe that others have given reason for you to believe that they believe "a pocket cleric is a difficult thing to use". It is not a difficult thing to use, and nobody has stated that it is - pocket clerics are simply objectively irrelevant to this discussion.

Remember: this thread is about a 4 caster/priest group. Speaking strictly mathematically, 4 =/= 5 hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Last edited by cyxthryth; 09-13-2022 at 12:45 PM..
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.