Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yet again you missed my point (or as usual you're twisting words to fit your own argument). It's not that redundancy is a problem. It's that everything the Shaman can offer, another class does BETTER. Better haste/slows, better CC, better healing and buffs overall.
So, yes, I'd much rather have 3 Enchanters all with hasted charm pets and a Cleric mowing through shit in like 5 seconds. That is likely the top 4 person combo in this argument. There's no real combination that can be legitimately argued as better here. A Shaman brings nothing to the table in the optimal combo.
|
Shamans have the best slow in the game, so you are incorrect there. A group without a Warrior does not need CH, and Torpor/Slow is going to mitigate the damage this group is taking just fine.
3x Enchanters are going to die more due to multiple charm breaks, which nobody wants to take into account.
You are overestimating DPS and CH for this group, while saying Shamans are bad without merit. 300 DPS vs 200 DPS is only saving you a few seconds per kill.