Best Trio That Doesn't Use Enchanter

[Snaggles]

Originally Posted by Rimitto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How does this tactic fair at level 20? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
YOU PEOPLE always seem to forget that "BiS" doesn't automatically mean "level 60 max tov gear". If it did, it would be called "Best Raid Trio" which is a stupid argument to begin with. Start Over.

Answer: Who cares about level 20? Same goes for your KC story.

Classes aren’t even coming into their element until nearly 60. It doesn’t take long though for rangers to realize they take a lot of damage where monks, knights and warriors do not. They literally are given two jolt spells…

I know this is me coming off as an elitist prick but there are a lot of things that separate a fun trio from “the best trio” or “the best trio without charm”. Capable people with capable gear can pull off some tricks. I can often contribute more with my ranger than other classes but if we need a tank I don’t log it in. Full stop. Also, I have a comparably geared ranger and paladin…so my actual experience with them over years > your fireside story.

Outside tanking slowed stuff so the sham healer doesn’t have to torp the whole group I don’t tank stuff with the ranger. Or outside raids when I tank brilliantly for 20 seconds plus one or two extra combat rounds.

Originally Posted by zelld52 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

SK does way more damage than ranger with top-tier gear. (Much better weapon availability, ie: Tuna sword, Palladius Axe, etc)

Agree to disagree. Outside some cherry picked parses or comparing a multi-AoB avatar Tuna sword SK to a generic ranger, they do less on raid bosses. Unless the ranger just doesn’t care about using the right weapons and getting buffs.