![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is variance still needed? | |||
| Yes, it promotes "competition" |
|
75 | 29.18% |
| No, its an unneccesary non-classic time sink |
|
182 | 70.82% |
| Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
edit: to be fair to Fountree, I'm sure he's not lying when he says they purposely didn't race us for Inny. But that doesn't mean we would have been beaten to it, or if we would have, that this time wasn't an exception. We've historically done well on server repops, as have all the other small guilds I think, and it's not just because the "big guilds" were generous, it's because they were overstretched and couldn't feasibly get every raid mob when they all spawned simultaneously. Whether they backed off of competing for Inny or not is a red herring. edit2: again, I don't want to sound rude or ungrateful! Just trying to stay on topic and say why simultaneous repops are better than no repops.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity> Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior Project 1999 (PvP): [50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis | |||
|
Last edited by Lazortag; 09-19-2012 at 11:58 AM..
|
|
|||
|
|