Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 07-29-2010, 10:00 AM
Filwen Filwen is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
im 42 and have 850 ac buffed. clerics tell me i tank better then a real tank frequently. rangers can tank.
You were getting pwned in efreeti. But you are only 42.
  #62  
Old 07-29-2010, 10:10 AM
Ripcord Ripcord is offline
Kobold

Ripcord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: nyc
Posts: 170
Default

yea those are too high yet but kobolds and bnb is fine
  #63  
Old 07-29-2010, 10:56 AM
Thac0 Thac0 is offline
Aviak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 65
Default

In vanilla EQ rangers and warriors defense cap is pretty similar. With Etched Ivy & Thorny Vine the AC gap is even less.

Come Kunark Rangers have very nice weapons that proc slow (and as any raider in vanilla onward knows, if you can slow it you can tank it, ask any shammy / Enchanter).

In other words the only people who say rangers can't tank are under-geared , dont know the game that well or using it as a segway into a joke that's just about as old as a Titantic (James Cameron) joke..and thus should be beaten with a sock full of hot nickles.
__________________
Brad's lying on a bunch of pillows in a back room pulling from a hookah pipe blowing out smoke rings and coming up with ideas for EQ and VG:

"Yeeahh. Dervish Camps. These Dervish people hang out in camps and then you come and kill them. For their rings. Yeah."
Last edited by Thac0; 07-29-2010 at 10:59 AM..
  #64  
Old 07-29-2010, 07:25 PM
Melias Melias is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Okay, since I've absorbed far too much info regarding EverQuest over the years....

In the first few months of EverQuest rangers (did it carry over in to Kunark? I don't remember)) had the EXACT same AC softcap as warriors (this I'm unsure of, but the next part I am sure of), and the EXACT same overcap returns. What this meant that as long as a warrior and ranger had the same AC they would see the same tanking ability (if you discounted skill differences).

However, at some point before Kunark this got changed and rangers got their overcap return on AC dropped down to 1/3rd or more of the benefit that warriors see. It's at this point that the tired old "rangers suck," "realistic fetal position," etc. crap started popping up. Warriors were particularly vicious in this since they finally got their status as THE best tank solidified and a lot of rangers did die cause they tried tanking/soloing content that they used to be able to. But tank they still could.

Whether a ranger tanks is all about your willingness to let him. They've solidly been the 4th tank of EverQuest it's entire history with only monks ever really challenging that.

So stop projecting the same tired old jokes onto the rangers around you, and maybe the good ones will LFG instead of sticking to their friends who don't think they're a resurrection waiting to happen.
  #65  
Old 07-29-2010, 11:01 PM
rioisk rioisk is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubbles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pooh is playing the part of the tanking Ranger in the above image.
+1

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #66  
Old 07-29-2010, 11:27 PM
Tarvas Tarvas is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Default

Your either a ranger....or your supporting a ranger. Take your pick.../grins evily
  #67  
Old 07-30-2010, 07:24 AM
Jael Jael is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It wasn't the most well-thought out plan from my perspective, but you're welcome.
I <3 My ranger! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Now if I could just find my bard and my rogue...
  #68  
Old 07-30-2010, 08:27 AM
mmiles8 mmiles8 is offline
Fire Giant

mmiles8's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 642
Default

AC returns after the soft cap has been reached
45%: Warrior
33%: Paladin, ShadowKnight, Monk (Under weight cap)
23%: Cleric, Bard
17%: Ranger, Rogue, Shaman
6%: Druid, Enc, Mag, Nec, Wiz

Shields ignore AC cap regardless of class.
  #69  
Old 07-30-2010, 08:31 AM
Messianic Messianic is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmiles8 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
AC returns after the soft cap has been reached
45%: Warrior
33%: Paladin, ShadowKnight, Monk (Under weight cap)
23%: Cleric, Bard
17%: Ranger, Rogue, Shaman
6%: Druid, Enc, Mag, Nec, Wiz

Shields ignore AC cap regardless of class.
Excuse the noob question, but what is the AC soft cap?
  #70  
Old 07-30-2010, 08:35 AM
mmiles8 mmiles8 is offline
Fire Giant

mmiles8's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 642
Default

Soft Caps
Cloth..........= ~75 worn AC (yes, it really that low)
Leather......= ~100 worn AC
Monk..........= ~120 worn AC (if they are under 15 stone wieght)
Chain.........= ~200 worn AC
Plate .........= ~300 worn AC

This is from GEAR ONLY. Meaning you take all of the items, manually add their AC, and count it toward this total. Not the number in your character sheet. The number in your character sheet is a much more complex formula that includes your agility, defense skill, etc.
Last edited by mmiles8; 07-30-2010 at 09:00 AM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.