GM Rule book from Kunark/ Velious - Limited CS Zones

[Joroz]

Originally Posted by Captain Faceplant [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Interesting that "training" appears nowhere in there. Since it's obviously a huge CS issue in EQ, it must have been left out for a reason. I mean, "sexual harassment" is still in there.

Incorrect, dumping of monsters on other players is covered under exploitation.

• PvP Switch Avoidance – Using in-game methods to work around the PvP switch and allowing non-PvP players to kill other players, such as hall blocking, dumping of monsters, or spell effects that cross that boundary due to a bug.

[timhutton]

Training was against the live PnP and therefore addressed for all zones, even those with hands off CSR:

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...&postcount=662

In the event you haven't noticed, or there is any confusion; P99's PnP is different from the one used on live EQ.

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by timhutton [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Training was against the live PnP and therefore addressed for all zones, even those with hands off CSR:

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...&postcount=662

In the event you haven't noticed, or there is any confusion; P99's PnP is different from the one used on live EQ.

PnnP

[Joroz]

Originally Posted by timhutton [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Training was against the live PnP and therefore addressed for all zones, even those with hands off CSR:

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...&postcount=662

In the event you haven't noticed, or there is any confusion; P99's PnP is different from the one used on live EQ.

Yes it was against the pnp which is different on here but pointing out it was also considered an exploit to use mobs to pvp other players under the rules.

[Godefroi]

Training wasn't allowed, thank you, QFT.

Sirken ?

[quido]

Remember when everyone thought the condoned training was unfair to TMO?

[Reguiy]

I'm against training, and all the BS that goes along with high end raiding. But when everyone cries about it on the forums I almost want the GMs to keep all that shit in. Anyone else with me?

[Godefroi]

Nope, Fennin Ro and TMO ( Besides Ele and Xasten ) are the only one that are voting against.

Then again, we all know those people don't like shit to be classic.

[Vandy]

I think if they are dead set on keeping the training aspect in that some sort of rules should be added to it.

Such that if you wish to train a guild that is going to attempt a VP run you have to have your VP raid force outside ready to move in. If you have no intent to immediately raid VP then you shouldn't be able to send in people to stall or grief.

[Reguiy]

Originally Posted by Godefroi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope, Fennin Ro and TMO ( Besides Ele and Xasten ) are the only one that are voting against.

Then again, we all know those people don't like shit to be classic.

Sweet. My name is Fennin now.