Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-18-2017, 12:11 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

@Cucs

I love the power of hindsight as well, its pretty incredible already knowing what happened then looking back and figuring out how to not arrive at the current present.

Aftermath gets a pass for their use bc their GL was the first to request a ceasefire of an unpolicable tactic so we will wash away all their abusers and the community will act like they never did it because AM gives out some uncontested mobs.

Got it.

No one even cares that the conversation about halting this tactic was pretty recent and after the petition had already been filed. It would have gone a long way to come to us directly with their claim, threaten to petition if we didnt stop THEN tried to get us to agree but that's not how AM rolls ( hats off to the lawyers )

This was a ruse all along to get some logs of the two GLs talking about this ( knowing Breaken wouldnt agree bc you cant police ) all while the petition sat. Cannot be more slimey tbh and even if Breaken said 'sure, we will do what we can' that petition would have still been active and more than likely result in the same raid suspension.

Hippos always gonna crit.
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
  #2  
Old 01-18-2017, 12:23 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
@Cucs

I love the power of hindsight as well, its pretty incredible already knowing what happened then looking back and figuring out how to not arrive at the current present.

Aftermath gets a pass for their use bc their GL was the first to request a ceasefire of an unpolicable tactic so we will wash away all their abusers and the community will act like they never did it because AM gives out some uncontested mobs.

Got it.

No one even cares that the conversation about halting this tactic was pretty recent and after the petition had already been filed. It would have gone a long way to come to us directly with their claim, threaten to petition if we didnt stop THEN tried to get us to agree but that's not how AM rolls ( hats off to the lawyers )

This was a ruse all along to get some logs of the two GLs talking about this ( knowing Breaken wouldnt agree bc you cant police ) all while the petition sat. Cannot be more slimey tbh and even if Breaken said 'sure, we will do what we can' that petition would have still been active and more than likely result in the same raid suspension.

Hippos always gonna crit.
To expand on my grow a pair comment - this isn't hindsight, this is leadership 101.

No one is giving AM a pass, stop trying so fucking hard to be a victim. The cockblock on the agreement to not do it was you guys - not AM. And this "we can't trust them so well maintain a shit raid scene" is a fucking lame dick excuse made by betas who don't let their girlfriends go out with their girlfriends because they "can't know for sure they won't fuck someone else".
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #3  
Old 01-18-2017, 12:36 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No one is giving AM a pass, stop trying so fucking hard to be a victim. The cockblock on the agreement to not do it was you guys - not AM.
Your sig is a remarkable depiction of your posting today.
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
  #4  
Old 01-18-2017, 12:36 PM
mefdinkins mefdinkins is offline
Fire Giant

mefdinkins's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And this "we can't trust them so well maintain a shit raid scene" is a fucking lame dick excuse
Was Lia awarded a Hoshkar staff during the terms of the VP agreement?
__________________
Evostab - Assassin | Ninjai - Grandmaster | Evocar - Sorcerer | Mefdinkins - Hierophant | Looch - Virtuoso | Snooch - Grandmaster
  #5  
Old 01-18-2017, 12:42 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Your sig is a remarkable depiction of your posting today.
Slow as fuck at work since we're in hypercare so I can shitpost all day!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mefdinkins [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Was Lia awarded a Hoshkar staff during the terms of the VP agreement?
What are you even talking about?

Rustle made it clear they would bounce on the agreement if we couldn't get an answer from you guild. After several weeks they got no answer so they left. Then the agreement was immediately put back together once your guild noticed they needed to actually do things.

What's the problem here? What sort of retarded mental gymnastics are you trying to do?
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #6  
Old 01-18-2017, 12:48 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rustle made it clear they would bounce on the agreement if we couldn't get an answer from you guild. After several weeks they got no answer so they left. Then the agreement was immediately put back together once your guild noticed they needed to actually do things.

What's the problem here? What sort of retarded mental gymnastics are you trying to do?
Glossing over the fact that the original agreement was broken by Rustle when you guys wanted a slot not joined with CSG...This again is further evidence why rotations/player agreements are subject to fail bc you have to chase down all these skype paper trails.

Im sure you guys have 'your side' of events and we have ours which becomes this cesspool of skype idiocy that we tried to end with Raid Discussion public agreements but was ignored

Oh well.
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
  #7  
Old 01-18-2017, 12:51 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Glossing over the fact that the original agreement was broken by Rustle when you guys wanted a slot not joined with CSG...This again is further evidence why rotations/player agreements are subject to fail bc you have to chase down all these skype paper trails.

Im sure you guys have 'your side' of events and we have ours which becomes this cesspool of skype idiocy that we tried to end with Raid Discussion public agreements but was ignored

Oh well.
No, there is the correct version of events and your incorrect version of events. Gets made it clear the agreement was in jeopardy because you ignored him. Then you act like a bunch of victims when it falls apart due to lack of any answer on your part. Emphasis on any answer - you outright ignored them.

I like how you're still pointing fingers. Maybe you can get Breaken to go drop a passive aggressive comment on Rustle's guild thread now.
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #8  
Old 01-18-2017, 12:57 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, there is the correct version of events and your incorrect version of events.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Im sure you guys have 'your side' of events and we have ours which becomes this cesspool of skype idiocy that we tried to end with Raid Discussion public agreements but was ignored
Exactly my point lol
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
  #9  
Old 01-18-2017, 01:03 PM
mefdinkins mefdinkins is offline
Fire Giant

mefdinkins's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, there is the correct version of events and your incorrect version of events.
So you're saying it's insane to mistrust guilds because all guilds will always follow their word and keep their promises. Unless, there is some sort of grey area, like if Awakened takes a little too long to listen to respond to you. Then it is Awakened's fault and they are pointing the finger or playing a victim for acknowledging that you broke an agreement?

All I am saying is that levels of trust between guilds can influence the likelihood of an agreement and you're saying that's bullshit and that you're always right and have a full understanding of the events. I wasn't even talking about when Rustle broke the first VP agreement, I am referring to when (as far as I know) Rustle broke the 2nd VP agreement by taking a hosh staff.

I really don't even give a shit but I would assume that a former member of BDA, Rampage, and Rustle would at least have some sort of perspective as to the frivolity of the raid scene and show some sort of understanding instead of just lashing out at people and calling them pieces of shit. Or maybe you're so narcissistic that your view of reasonableness, fairness and great leadership all only comes from your individual perspective as seen by your previous signature saying fuck detoxx and now you saying fuck breaken.
__________________
Evostab - Assassin | Ninjai - Grandmaster | Evocar - Sorcerer | Mefdinkins - Hierophant | Looch - Virtuoso | Snooch - Grandmaster
  #10  
Old 01-18-2017, 04:23 PM
BallzDeep BallzDeep is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, there is the correct version of events and your incorrect version of events. Gets made it clear the agreement was in jeopardy because you ignored him. Then you act like a bunch of victims when it falls apart due to lack of any answer on your part. Emphasis on any answer - you outright ignored them.

I like how you're still pointing fingers. Maybe you can get Breaken to go drop a passive aggressive comment on Rustle's guild thread now.
Your quoting Getsome as a good leader when the guy up and left his guild high and dry quite a few times. You obviously don't know what's good for you and what's shit.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.