Face Diapers Don't Do Anything

[G13]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What happened man? You had science on your side... Makes you look REALLY stupid, now. Seeing as how you didnt understand the paper in the first place. lol

I know shes such a fickle mistress. Always changing and making you look stupid in front of everyone lol.

It's just censorship

Not Science

Where do the vast majority of Covid infections occur?

[Baler]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[cd288]

Lol this G13 dude is such a sad human being; still can’t just take the L and instead just rambles on to cover his embarrassment that he didn’t understand shit

[G13]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol this G13 dude is such a sad human being; still can’t just take the L and instead just rambles on to cover his embarrassment that he didn’t understand shit

Censorship isn't Science

[Ennewi]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_standards

The statement that something is "backed by science" tends to carry great weight because it implies a tested, evidence-based validity to the idea. Such assertions are often made in marketing a product, idea, or even a belief system, even if it hasn't actually been exposed to the rigors of science.

Pseudoscience has been defined as "claims presented so that they appear [to be] scientific even though they lack supporting evidence and plausibility."[3] Wikipedia is concerned[4] about pseudoscience because it has the potential to make Wikipedia less reliable if not presented properly. Wikipedia does sometimes allow pseudoscience to be presented as a social phenomenon, if it is notable. However, Wikipedia editors must be careful to clearly separate science from pseudoscience in articles and to explain the criteria for distinction. There is broad community support to not misrepresent science by painting pseudoscience as science.

When pseudoscience may be presented, it must be presented properly. Pseudoscience should always be accompanied by the corresponding scientific view, and should not obfuscate descriptions of relevant scientific evidence or the lack of scientific evidence. All the applicable opinions about pseudoscience should be described in proportion to their prominence, which in science and medicine related discussions is weighted to the majority view among experts in the field of scientific study. In the interest of describing topics fully, articles written about notable pseudoscientific concepts may require a fair amount of detail in the article about the topic, but care should be taken to clearly attribute the views of proponents without implying that such views are actually statements of fact. In contrast, less descriptive detail (or none at all) should be included in articles that are not strictly about a pseudoscience if the putatively relevant pseudoscience in question is of little or no notability.

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Censorship isn't Science

You see how hes the victim in all this?? Those darn lefties got it out for him. They censored that shitty paper he didnt understand, just to make people like him look stupid. It was an international plot, and hes the victim of this horrible censorship. $20 says hes never been wrong, blames everyone else for his shit life, everyone is out to get him. "the government" is mean to him, too. Such a victim, poor baby. She needs her bottle.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Censorship isn't Science

Did someone call the waaambulance yet for this guy or do I need to?

[Blingy]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Did someone call the waaambulance yet for this guy or do I need to?

That's "Call Da AMBALAMPS!" sir.

[HalflingSpergand]

I'm throwing the baby out with the bathwater, science is over. Might have been some potential there but it's long gone

[Shawk]

Originally Posted by HalflingSpergand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm throwing the baby out with the bathwater, science is over. Might have been some potential there but it's long gone

right: "Science is over.."
left: "Academics is over.."

one in the same