![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
Taking into consideration the possibility of a second Chernobyl is lacking perspective...how? The point being made wasn't solely about fish. I know, hard to believe since my guild makes every effort to down Koi, Fay, etc. | |||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
And if you have something against Chernobyl, then focus your energy at beurocracy because that is what caused that disaster, not the plant. If you took ALL the damage nuke power has caused, and put it up against the best case scenario for all other forms of power the damage to the environment is literally a puddle, next to an ocean. That's the perspective I think we screwed up, ironically it was the same political group that is for fixing the environment, that was against nuclear power. | |||
|
Last edited by Jibartik; 07-27-2021 at 12:48 PM..
| ||||
|
#3
|
|||||
|
Quote:
https://www.nytimes.com/1986/08/26/w...chernobyl.html Yes, the choice was made in order to save money. https://www.mydenveraccidentlawfirm....-of-the-pinto/ But again, according to the quote made by Andreev, no studies were conducted on Chernobyl by the industry. Quote:
Chernobyl is still a reality, which I am comparing to other real events like the one in Fukushima. The only fantasy elements mentioned? Water dragonses. A missed opportunity on your part to speculate on custom content related to Bertoxxulous. Also, the article about Onondaga Lake detailed the effect of mercury levels dating back to the 1940s, providing yet more perspective on the topic. | ||||
![]() |
|
|