Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's look at this thread: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...62#post3634462. Jimajam starts with some pointed but gentle disagreement:



Then he gives an objectively fair assessment on the disparity between your perspective and mine:


Then he responds to DSM again, ending his post with:


DSM starts his response by accusing Jimjam of misreading:



And ends by somehow misinterpreting this clearly self-deprecating joke as an insult.


Jimjam, pleasantly & politely, points out that it was self-deprecating:



And then DSM bites his face off:



Jimjam was hurt:

Claiming "please stop trolling" is biting someone's head off is silly. This alone shows you are reading this exchange in a biased manner, where you are showing Jimjam in a positive light, and me in a negative light.

I disagree that Jimjam was being polite here. It sounded like he was mocking my honest assessment that he needed to re-read my post by reposting "Please reread my post as you have not understood". Mocking someone like this is an example of trolling.

I have nothing against Jimjam. If he says he didn't mean it in that way, I'll be happy to retract what I said. I never call someone a troll without a reason. It's possible I misread someones intent, but I am not using this as some tactic to discredit people. Your example doesn't show this. What else do you have?

[bcbrown]

You said he was trolling, he was hurt by your accusations, and he was clearly not trolling.

[Zuranthium]

Jesus christ you people are still going on and on, when 4 mages is definitely the best group ever. I will let you all in on a secret to end this discussion: if there are exactly 4 mages in a party and each summons a pet of different element type, the game treats it as if each pet is all 4 pets at the same time. All of their HP, AC, regen, spells, resistances, and attack rounds, all of it, added together. So you get 4 pets doing up to 16 attacks per round, spamming stun and root, having huge damage shields and being generally unkillable. You're welcome.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You said he was trolling, he was hurt by your accusations, and he was clearly not trolling.

Troxx also just said he isn't trolling:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5220

Do you agree with Troxx that he isn't trolling?

[bcbrown]

You said "You have no evidence to suggest I call people who disagree with me trolls." and I provided that evidence, when you called Jimjam a troll for disagreeing with you.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You said "You have no evidence to suggest I call people who disagree with me trolls." and I provided that evidence, when you called Jimjam a troll for disagreeing with you.

And you still don't have evidence. I disagree with your assessment of what happened in that exchange. Your bias by claiming "please stop trolling" is biting someone's head off is apparent.

You dodged my question about Troxx, as it makes a point that is relevant to the exchange with Jimjam.

Do you agree with Troxx's self assessment that he is not trolling?

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5220

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Jesus christ you people are still going on and on, when 4 mages is definitely the best group ever. I will let you all in on a secret to end this discussion: if there are exactly 4 mages in a party and each summons a pet of different element type, the game treats it as if each pet is all 4 pets at the same time. All of their HP, AC, regen, spells, resistances, and attack rounds, all of it, added together. So you get 4 pets doing up to 16 attacks per round, spamming stun and root, having huge damage shields and being generally unkillable. You're welcome.

mage pets are unclassically nerfed on p99

unclassic low pet dmg, unclassic agro, when a pet dies the mage gets 100% of all the agro that the pet generated and it's very difficult to get mobs to agro other targets if nothing else was close to the pet's total agro number

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And you still don't have evidence. I disagree with your assessment of what happened in that exchange.

If you think Jimjam was trolling in that exchange, your definition is clearly grossly distorted, and I'm satisfied that will be clear to any disinterested party.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you think Jimjam was trolling in that exchange, your definition is clearly grossly distorted, and I'm satisfied that will be clear to any disinterested party.

It's actually quite easy to see who's definition is grossly distorted. Let's find some common ground on who we think is a troll.

Lets start with Troxx. Let it be noted he did admit to being a troll, and he admitted seeing other trolls too:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=114

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look guys, I’m an honest fella. I will readily admit to having engaged in trolling behavior with regards to DSM. You all have functioning brain cells … so I know that you all already know this. I also know that many of you also have done this. I’m not apologetic in the slightest sense of the word either.

Let it also be noted that Bcbrown consistently dodges the question about whether or not Troxx is a troll, and I've never seen Bcbrown call Troxx out for this.

Can you explain why you think Troxx is or is not a Troll?

You aren't going to convince people they should listen to you about what the definition of a troll is if you keep dodging this question, especially when Troxx has admitted to being a troll.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Just to put the final nail in the coffin of Bcbrown's Jimjam example:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=369

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thank you for the apology. I apologize that I misread your post. Remember that I can only see your text, not your intent. That is why we need to be careful with what we post. This includes myself.

I apologized to Jimjam for misreading his earlier post. This was conveniently left out by Bcbrown.

Bcbrown also conveniently keeps dodging the question about Troxx being a troll or not:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5229