Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Melee

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-28-2025, 12:19 PM
TytosOfEight TytosOfEight is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goregasmic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Parses or it never happened.

We'd have to know your ranger AC before and after the 100ac increase and non-velious raid geared monks probably have much lower than 200ac worn so yes, an AC increase would benefit them more. But monks also have better mitigation so without detailed data we don't know where the difference would come from but so far it doesn't seem to be AC for the level ranges tested.

My only "claim" is there seems to be a 160ac hard cap on level 40 mobs and a 200ac hard cap on level 45 mobs, regardless of classes tested. The parses showed it so this is pretty much undisputable. No one can claim AC is useless on a ranger. Without further parses on higher level mobs it is hard to pinpoint where and why the wheels fall off for rangers.

Geonids are 44-48 IIRC so I suspect the results wouldn't be wildly different compared to the lvl 45 mob but without detailed parses we'll never know.

This is a post about the claw of lightning though so if people feel strongly about ranger AC, lets go discuss it in the appropriate thread.
I'm not linking parse because I'm not digging through my log files to find it, and I don't care much if you believe it or not. My point still stands about higher levels though.

Having said that, my ranger AC went from 1055 to 1160 (no difference on Geonids after 60 kills - 30 in each AC group). On my Monk, his AC was higher, and it was something like 1170 and 1260, and he saw a fairly meaningful difference in damage mitigation on the same mobs.

Feel free to test it yourself.

Regarding the main point of this thread: I find my Cek sword more frustrating than BoF/SW overall, because it just misses so many damn swings. My BoF/SW feels more consistent overall, albeit with fewer high parses.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.