![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
This is what Verant had intended I guess. Unsure when these changes were applied though ;/
Quote:
| |||
|
Last edited by Treats; 02-03-2012 at 08:08 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
That post is from the end of velious class discussions, right? That would seem to indicate that monks were barely outdamaging warriors at all. Look, I don't have legit data from 2000. All I'm saying is right now monks are outdamaging ragebringer rogues at L50 (yes every rogue on the server by now has a ragebringer) while warriors do half as much. I find it really hard to believe that's classic.
Another parse, this time from SolB: my dps is even worse here because most of the mobs were higher level bats and bugs and I spent a decent amount of time stunned. Also in this post Wonderr and I were mostly in the front while Trevelain is in the back. And somehow my guild has utterly failed to get my warrior twink a Jagged Blade of War. So I don't actually consider these numbers that outrageous. Trevelain: 50 Half-elf Rogue with Ragebringer --- DMG: 87021 (50.82%) @ 32 dps (30 sdps) --- DMG to PC: 5465 @2dps Sakuragi: 49 Iksar warrior, Sarnak Warhammer/Wurmslayer mostly --- DMG: 42400 (24.76%) @ 14 dps (14 sdps) --- DMG to PC: 32839 @11dps Wonderr: 50 barb warrior, Zealot's Incarnadine Sword, no haste --- DMG: 36273 (21.19%) @ 12 dps (12 sdps) --- DMG to PC: 25177 @9dps @treats: He had haste originally (was doing over 40 dps) then it dropped. That was where I began the parse. He was wearing the fungi tunic the whole time and I did not see a ton of annoying bard particle effects. @travatron: If you people were actually reading what I was writing, you would know that I am aware that classic monks are somewhat overpowered. This is my twink, if he is a little underpowered for Naggy/Vox I don't really care. Besides, as you say classic is as classic does. What I am saying is that the current disparity is just so insane, any normal person would think it is unlikely to be classic. Now maybe it is, but if so I'd like to see how and why the devs decided to make it this way. | ||
|
Last edited by Splorf22; 02-03-2012 at 08:23 PM..
|
|
||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
And if you want to see if this was the case, and if you want to see how and why the devs decided to do things the way they did, then fucking google it. No one here is going to do it for you, especially since they all just think you're a whiny non-monk by this point. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
So you post a parse that shows a monk doing twice the damage as you. Then you post one that shows that when you're using 2hb, the monk is now only doing 50% more damage than you. Then you post a bunch of stuff showing that monks should be about 50% more dps than warriors.
Are you trying to thank the developers for doing such a good job on getting the balance classic? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Lets see Orruar. I did 18 dps with Sarnak Warhammer/Wurmslayer. I did 22 dps with Staff of Battle. That's a 22% increase. So 2HB must be quite a bit better, I guess this is just amazingly balanced is all.
Oh wait, I guess you didn't read the part where I said I had shaman buffs in the Sol B parse. I'm pretty sure I had quickness not alacrity which would give me 1.51/1.21 = gee, a 25% damage increase. I must be a complete idiot. If you had paid any attention to the graphs you would see that from L30->L50 monk damage goes insane (factor of 3) while warrior damage increases by 50%. @dravingar (one of the few people actually reading posts) I'm guessing you had enchanter haste though. At least from what I saw he wasn't AFK'ing massively. And cause he was >50% of our DPS, I think I would have noticed. Anyway, I'm tired of this thread. 90% of the people here are either not paying attention or worse. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|