Dark Ascension...phallax, quite the char

[Phallax]

I dont even know why Im defending myself against a community full of self indulged jack asses. I was in the right in every way. Im done GG NO RE keep posting.

[President]

Originally Posted by gnomishfirework [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am aware, but a camp is considered if you are in the room. The rules are clear on this. Until another group zones in, you are free to kill whatever, but if you aren't clearing an area and someone comes and starts clearing the room, it is theres.

In this case, the area is "cleared" because the named mob or PH is not spawned. There are many other camps around norrath where you don't have to clear the entire room to kill the named. In many cases, the Lord in guk can be pulled without having to kill his guards. If a group rolled down, saw that the named/ph wasn't up, but the guards were, do you think it would be acceptable for them to claim the room as there even though an enchanter has been "clearing" a few of the named/ph's? Or should he be given the chance to choose his camp like the rules state?

[President]

Originally Posted by Phallax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dont even know why Im defending myself against a community full of self indulged jack asses. I was in the right in every way. Im done GG NO RE keep posting.

Looks like someone finally realized they are a douchebag. Have fun.

[soup]

Originally Posted by Phallax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I love people that never read the full posts, just want they want to post about. Maybe you skipped the part where "I never CC any camp I can just run to" part? Yea that. It wasnt omg theres 50s in this zone Ishva might be claimed! It was hey I zoned in lets go look at Ishva as I do every time.

So keep the douchebaggery claims coming, it just further prooves you are indeed the douchebags of the thread.

Right, you don't CC camps because you know that gives you less chance of taking a camp from under someone's nose.

[eqdruid76]

Originally Posted by Phallax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dont even know why Im defending myself against a community full of self indulged jack asses. I was in the right in every way. Im done GG NO RE keep posting.

You should probaby be more concerned that you made R&F at all. This isn't the first time, either. The fact that you have multiple players getting pissed enough to make posts about you ought to tell you something. It probably doesn't, but it OUGHT to. /shrug

[Phallax]

Originally Posted by eqdruid76 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You should probaby be more concerned that you made R&F at all. This isn't the first time, either. The fact that you have multiple players getting pissed enough to make posts about you ought to tell you something. It probably doesn't, but it OUGHT to. /shrug

Im pretty sure this is the first one...
Sorry had to jump back in on that.

[eqdruid76]

Originally Posted by Phallax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Im pretty sure this is the first one...
Sorry had to jump back in on that.

You're wrong.

A lot of complaints in-game as well.

And from now on, call camp checks before you piss more people off. It will save you some amount of grief and hostility.

[gnomishfirework]

Originally Posted by President [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In this case, the area is "cleared" because the named mob or PH is not spawned. There are many other camps around norrath where you don't have to clear the entire room to kill the named. In many cases, the Lord in guk can be pulled without having to kill his guards. If a group rolled down, saw that the named/ph wasn't up, but the guards were, do you think it would be acceptable for them to claim the room as there even though an enchanter has been "clearing" a few of the named/ph's? Or should he be given the chance to choose his camp like the rules state?

If they were sitting in the room, yea. It is there camp.

Otherwise, someone can call it without being there just because they have a tracker, and they can maximize their names without having to "claim" the camp as per the rules. This is the exact situation the rules are made to prevent.

If the rules aren't enforced to the letter there will be anarchy. Consistancy is key. Sure, maybe the OP was very courteous and willing to come to some agreement and made a great effort to do so despite Phallanx's douche baggery, but the rules man. The rules.

[Phallax]

Originally Posted by eqdruid76 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're wrong.

A lot of complaints in-game as well.

And from now on, call camp checks before you piss more people off. It will save you some amount of grief and hostility.

Show me the post about ME. And give me names of in-game. I gaurantee you pretty much everyone I encounter Im generous and helpful to...Even IB...

[eqdruid76]

Originally Posted by gnomishfirework [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If they were sitting in the room, yea. It is there camp.

Otherwise, someone can call it without being there just because they have a tracker, and they can maximize their names without having to "claim" the camp as per the rules. This is the exact situation the rules are made to prevent.

If the rules aren't enforced to the letter there will be anarchy. Consistancy is key. Sure, maybe the OP was very courteous and willing to come to some agreement and made a great effort to do so despite Phallanx's douche baggery, but the rules man. The rules.

Isn't there another rule that states when you claim acamp, you must state as such in /shout?