Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As you typically love to do you posted one log of one fight and parade it around as data/evidence. If you’re so confident your data is accurate why not do an aggregate of multiple fights? You know like 5-10 fights? Why not have the charming mob fighting the same mob/type level as the warrior?

Why didn’t you join a fast paced group for an hour or two like we asked you? Why not do that and aggregate the data for an extended session? Why did you just post single fight logs of you root rotting a level 40 frog as a substitute?

Too much work?
Scared of the results?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Remember that GIF? I tossed it out there a few times when I challenged you to prove what you could do in a fast paced group. I stopped legitimately having a discussion with you the moment I threw down the gauntlet and laid out the ground rules and you refused or just changed directions.

You didn’t have the balls to nut up.
You lack the humility to shut up like most non-autistic cowards would do in similar circumstances.

Such a tool

If you are so confident you are right, please post data you claim isn't from a faulty parser.

I have video evidence with logs. You have nothing but faulty data. You need to provide better evidence first lol.

This is your flaw. For some reason you believe that you don't need to provide evidence, everybody else does.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you are so confident you are right, please post data you claim isn't from a faulty parser.

You have provided zero evidence that the parser Troxx used is faulty. You may type whatever you wish & feel however you feel about it, it will not change this fact.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have video evidence with logs.

Have you provided the relevant/requested data/evidence of your Shaman DPSing in a high level, fast-paced-killing DPS group? Please indicate where that data/evidence was provided.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have nothing but faulty data.

You have not provided any evidence to prove this claim.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You need to provide better evidence first lol.

You need to provide the relevant/requested data/evidence. Or any reply at all hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As you typically love to do you posted one log of one fight and parade it around as data/evidence. If you’re so confident your data is accurate why not do an aggregate of multiple fights? You know like 5-10 fights? Why not have the charming mob fighting the same mob/type level as the warrior?

Why didn’t you join a fast paced group for an hour or two like we asked you? Why not do that and aggregate the data for an extended session? Why did you just post single fight logs of you root rotting a level 40 frog as a substitute?

Too much work?
Scared of the results?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Remember that GIF? I tossed it out there a few times when I challenged you to prove what you could do in a fast paced group. I stopped legitimately having a discussion with you the moment I threw down the gauntlet and laid out the ground rules and you refused or just changed directions.

You didn’t have the balls to nut up.
You lack the humility to shut up like most non-autistic cowards would do in similar circumstances.

Such a tool

He literally cherrypicks data using variables that favor his chosen argument and repeats it over and over then is surprised when nobody gives it any weight. If he isn't actually mentally challenged this is the stupidest human being I've ever conversed with.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He literally cherrypicks data using variables that favor his chosen argument and repeats it over and over then is surprised when nobody gives it any weight. If he isn't actually mentally challenged this is the stupidest human being I've ever conversed with.

You literally have zero data and think it's better, and are surprised when people disagree with you.

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You literally have zero data and think it's better, and are surprised when people disagree with you.

Only 1 person disagrees with me and his mental state is questionable at best. I feel pretty good about where I stand regardless of your irrelevant opinion.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He literally cherrypicks data using variables that favor his chosen argument and repeats it over and over then is surprised when nobody gives it any weight. If he isn't actually mentally challenged this is the stupidest human being I've ever conversed with.

Yes. We all know this.

[Troxx]

The data was not faulty. I fully explained what happens when you aggregate. I broke out individual fights from the aggregate.

I did precisely what you asked me to do. You, on the other hand haven’t even tried. Worse, however, you chose to ignore the discussion and skew said parses I gave you with your twisted DSM logic and mathematical gymnastics to fit your personally desired talking points.

Lol this is hilarious

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The data was not faulty. I fully explained what happens when you aggregate. I broke out individual fights from the aggregate.

I did precisely what you asked me to do. You, on the other hand haven’t even tried. Worse, however, you chose to ignore the discussion and skew said parses I gave you with your twisted DSM logic and mathematical gymnastics to fit your personally desired talking points.

Lol this is hilarious

You have no proof of your claims that your parser reduces your mage DPS by 30%. The only reason why you think this is because the monk who is pulling is losing 30% DPS. If your claim was correct, the Monk would be losing more than 30% DPS, because the parser is undervaluing his data, AND he is losing DPS due to pulling.

I gave you video evidence and log evidence. It is superior to your evidence. The flaw with your logic is you believe DPS will change in a group. Mob stats do not change, so this is simply wrong. Once you knew you were backed into a corner, you have since played this silly semantics game of "you didn't give me the evidence I wanted in the specific manner I requested it, therefore it's wrong". Sorry, that isn't a valid argument lol, and it doesn't disprove my data.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have no proof of your claims that your parser reduces your mage DPS by 30%. The only reason why you think this is because the monk who is pulling is losing 30% DPS. If your claim was correct, the Monk would be losing more than 30% DPS, because the parser is undervaluing his data, AND he is losing DPS due to pulling.

You baselessly and ceaselessly claiming something does not make it true. It has to actually be true hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] You can type whatever you wish and you can feel however you feel about it, it will not change the facts.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I gave you video evidence and log evidence. It is superior to your evidence. The flaw with your logic is you believe DPS will change in a group. Mob stats do not change, so this is simply wrong. Once you knew you were backed into a corner, you have since played this silly semantics game of "you didn't give me the evidence I wanted in the specific manner I requested it, therefore it's wrong". Sorry, that isn't a valid argument lol, and it doesn't disprove my data.

You did not provide the relevant/requested data. You thinking that you provided the relevant/requested data does not make it true. You may type whatever you wish and feel however you wish, it is not going to change these facts.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have no proof of your claims that your parser reduces your mage DPS by 30%. The only reason why you think this is because the monk who is pulling is losing 30% DPS. If your claim was correct, the Monk would be losing more than 30% DPS, because the parser is undervaluing his data, AND he is losing DPS due to pulling.

I gave you video evidence and log evidence. It is superior to your evidence. The flaw with your logic is you believe DPS will change in a group. Mob stats do not change, so this is simply wrong. Once you knew you were backed into a corner, you have since played this silly semantics game of "you didn't give me the evidence I wanted in the specific manner I requested it, therefore it's wrong". Sorry, that isn't a valid argument lol, and it doesn't disprove my data.

The other mage pet in that aggregate is an epic mage pet. You think it’s dps is that low too?

Ps parsers only start when the damage starts. He wasn’t out there flopping mobs into camp. This is crypt where we never had to deal with a pull larger than 2 or 3. You’ll notice we had no rogue so yeah … none of the back room and Emperor was on the menu.

So much for the “he was out pulling” bs.