Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2016, 03:43 PM
Phantasm Phantasm is offline
Sarnak

Phantasm's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cabilis
Posts: 216
Default

Your bumps are being ignored.

This is one of those political issues that need to be talked about for 8 months before an ineffective raid summit is called together, ultimately resulting in no change
__________________
Vetus ~ Tyrs ~ Draoi ~ Audios
  #2  
Old 04-26-2016, 04:25 PM
Raev Raev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,290
Default

BDA, I can assure you that under current rules A/A will have no trouble pulling dragons to either East or West without TL boxes. This rule change will not enable a golden age of constant TOV crawls.
  #3  
Old 04-26-2016, 05:24 PM
Man0warr Man0warr is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
BDA, I can assure you that under current rules A/A will have no trouble pulling dragons to either East or West without TL boxes. This rule change will not enable a golden age of constant TOV crawls.
Doesn't matter. Couldn't bind in any Velious dungeon on live, shouldn't be able to on P99 either.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will>
Manowarr - Druid

Blue
Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA>
Shiroe - 60 Enchanter
Manowarr - 60 Druid
  #4  
Old 11-08-2016, 03:35 PM
nyclin nyclin is offline
Fire Giant

nyclin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 613
Default

bump - we've had unclassic binding rules in ToV for way too long. reset existing binds and remove the luclin-era roamers in the safe hall.
  #5  
Old 11-09-2016, 02:37 PM
nyclin nyclin is offline
Fire Giant

nyclin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 613
Default

bump - got some quality evidence in this thread. here are some choice posts:

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...2&postcount=29
http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...5&postcount=61
http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...5&postcount=78
http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=80

thus far, nobody has been able to present conclusive evidence that binding should be allowed. there's plenty of anecdotal evidence suggesting that binding wasn't allowed, but nothing that outright states "you can't bind in ToV."

given that nobody can conclusively prove that binding should be allowed, we should err on the side of caution and change this mechanic to a more classic state until evidence supporting binding in ToV can be found.
  #6  
Old 12-03-2016, 04:04 PM
nyclin nyclin is offline
Fire Giant

nyclin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 613
Default

bumperino
  #7  
Old 12-03-2016, 10:34 PM
lurk lurk is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 171
Default

I dont even see the issue here. Theres no real proof you could bind in TOV and i feel like it was common knowledge that you couldnt. AFIAK on live today you cant bind there
  #8  
Old 12-06-2016, 10:21 AM
nyclin nyclin is offline
Fire Giant

nyclin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 613
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lurk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I dont even see the issue here. Theres no real proof you could bind in TOV and i feel like it was common knowledge that you couldnt. AFIAK on live today you cant bind there
I think the real issue is that the CSR staff doesn't want to deal with the inevitable shitshow when ToV raiding is turned on its head. On the other hand, there are a lot of bored raiders that would greatly enjoy having a new challenge to overcome.
  #9  
Old 12-04-2016, 05:59 PM
Ikon Ikon is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Recently we evaluated many underutilized dungeons and considered reasons why they might be underutilized. Some people suggested that proximity of bind locations plays a part, and as such we are considering adding more binding locations to the game. We of course will not allow everyone to bind on the doorstep of a dungeon, but these changes should hopefully reduce the potential run for a melee class. While additional binding locations probably will not be in the next patch, we did want to discuss our thoughts on the matter.
http://everquest.allakhazam.com/edit...rs_letter.html

Quote:
Exactly where a caster can bind themselves depends on what area of the game we're talking about. In the area of the original game (i.e. Antonica, Faydwer, and Odus) a caster can bind themself anywhere, inside or out. In Kunark and Velious, however, they are only able to bind themselves in outdoor areas, and can not be bound in dungeons
http://web.archive.org/web/200712300...bindguide.html
Last edited by Ikon; 12-04-2016 at 06:16 PM..
  #10  
Old 12-04-2016, 06:53 PM
Ikon Ikon is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
He earlier states being bound at PoM would be great and then unequivocally states "as you can't bind in ToV."
You could definitely bind in PoM
Quote:
be aware that you can no longer bind in PoM, on live servers.

PLEASE correct me if i'm wrong, but i dont think i am, because if i am wrong, time for me to go back to pom, so correct me fast
Link
Last edited by Ikon; 12-04-2016 at 07:08 PM..
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.