![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Daywolf, how does one preach to four pieces of parchment or paper folded into eight leaves, and kudos to Microsoft for knowing what a quire is. Figure out Sephiroth yet?
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, as I mentioned, I never was into FF, so don't know the lore. "Sephiroth is a fictional character in the role-playing video game Final Fantasy VII developed by Square, where he is the main villain."
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
Nah, a choir does all the singing, like entertainment. w/o one doesn't mean there is no music, just means everyone participates. Usually a band to lead or whatnot, I've done that a lot in the past with my acoustic guitars, fun stuff. So you want to know what denom I'm in? Hmm, well quite frankly none. I haven't gone to a denominational church since I was a teen. By late teens had a grasp (from 1st Presbyterian), then went to community type churches from then on. I'm not really "religious" in the sense, more the free gift stuff, while religions do the works for salvation/acceptance stuff most of them. It's just a done deal. I don't even consider myself a "protestant", which is out of the reformation, out of Western Catholicism. More rooted to Eastern Orthodoxy, from anyway. Went to a college for religious studies, learned stuff, did stuff, then went to another college later for computer science, still did more stuff. Always studying something, even stuff I don't agree with. As far as science and technology, formally electronics and computer science; applied sciences. Informally, astronomy and cosmology. Considerable time into it, books, mags, telescopes etc. since I was young. Also life-long interests in sociology, literature, political science, archeology, ancient history, music theory, video gaming eheeh. My first real science obsession were black holes, and we really didn't know much about them in the 70's.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by Daywolf; 09-20-2016 at 07:09 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
(((sephiroth)))
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
'Kabbalah teaches the benefit of focusing on the aspect of each Sephirah related to the particular day of the Omer. A person would examine each of their spiritual qualities, as a rectification process of Teshuva (Return to God), in preparation to reliving the acceptance of the Torah.'
hmmm... may the flouride be with me... | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Space isn't empty, it's full of stuff, every inch is full. If it were nothingness, then nothing could be in space. But no matter where you go in known space, there is something. It's like if I scribble with a pincel in the air, then scribble the pincel on a sheet of paper, which will show a mark? Space is like that paper, it's marked with particles. Even more than that, but the very fabric of time.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Yeah, nothingness could be 3 inches from your face and you'd never know it. You can't put anything into it and you cant take anything out. There is just nothing there at all. You pass right through it, while at the same time you don't pass through it because it's just not there.
Time and space just can't go on forever, never enough time for it to get there. No matter the model, there must be a boundry. Even if it loops around end to end. Outside time and space has gotta be the freakiest thing, a place not bound by time and space as we know it.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Let's assume that everything that can be was and is and will be. Each of these possibilities then are points in space time, (Nothing new up to that point) which we can be best understood as a three-dimensional sphere, or I suppose could be unlimited 3d space, though that would be redundant, unnecessary. Or perception of time is simply our movement from point to point throughout this sphere of space time.
The interesting part is that given infinite possibilities, our movements through space-time must necessarily decrease infinitely as we move 'forward' in time (through space-time). Would have to adapt this for three-dimensional space, but I think a 2-d approximation of this idea would just be something like P = (1/t), where p is position in space-time and t is elapsed time since... whatever.
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|