Quote:
Originally Posted by Polycaster
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I still enjoy thinking about how a smart guy pretended to be dumb in order to troll dumb people pretending to be smart got inside your heads to such a degree.
|
Response:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horza
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As we all know there's nothing smarter than pretending to be an idiot, especially a good looking one.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polycaster
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We've already done the AGW thing. Recap: I post evidence that the metrics and methodology of studies X,Y,Z are flawed, thereby disproving the 97% consensus claim. The only attempt at using data to disprove that was to cite those very same studies that claim there is a 97% consensus... One of the more relevant pieces of info was that individual scientists that were supposedly amongst the 97% came forward to say they were not amongst the 97%. You can't get much more debunked than that.
The levels to which you people use AJ as a way to discount valid information is itself a conspiracy theory worthy of AJ. You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.
|
Evidently you forgot about this, where all the arguments you made about global warming were completely and utterly destroyed:
Tzug, middle of page:
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...348192&page=24
Also, I've seen you use the term "non sequitur" probably 5-6 times now, and am still convinced you don't know what it means. Anytime you're responded to it's exactly in reference to something you said previously. That's the exact opposite of a "non-sequitur."
Still waiting for you to respond with how you're a "real American." Also convinced you don't know what that means, yet I'm dying to see your justification for what you've done that makes you such a great patriot.