The real story behind the Nihilum forced disbanding.

[Stasis01]

If you can't beat em, join em, for a bit - then kick them in the balls.

[Drakaris]

Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you can't beat em, join em, for a bit - then kick them in the balls.

Cool, with that mentality, where do I sign up to Azrael? I promise I won't gather evidence of Lite 2 boxing and doing other shady stuff to get him banned!

Pinky promise!

[Elderan]

Originally Posted by Solitary [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh man, is this message from Derubael real? Its time for him to step down...

100% real.

[Stasis01]

U can't sign up faggot get to steppen.

[Derubael]

Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

100% real.

We do this all the time. It's one of many tools we use to collect information. Not sure what the problem is.

Also, I didn't read the first two pages, but I read the OP - I never said anything about a "TS recording". I don't know where this information comes from. We banned Nizzarr for in-game actions.

Not that we needed to - anything outside of the game we could use as evidence as well, as Sirken pointed out to you in a PM.

One big point you're forgetting, Elderan, is that this wasn't just my decision. I may have sent the message, but make no mistake - the CSR staff decided this needed to happen. We can't have former guild leaders who were removed for RMT be in positions of power after getting caught. This should have been a no-brainer.

He broke the rules, he got caught, and you're grasping at straws to try and justify your actions as being my fault.

Drop it and move on. I'm tired of defending myself for something that was decided upon by the senior CSR staff and management. An action that was the right call based on our servers rules.

Two things, because I don't want to hear about it anymore:

Originally Posted by Rogean

Lets get one thing straight folks. We don't answer to you.

There has been a lot of petitions lately, a lot of posts on the forums, with everyone trying to critique GM Decisions. The developers of this project put way too much time into this for us to be put on the spotlight every single time we make a decision, ESPECIALLY when you ASSUME you know all the facts. 90% of the time, you don't. Situations are handled between the staff and the players directly involved. Any dialog between a GM and a player can be considered a private matter, and will not be open to public debate. Players will divulge their interactions with GM's as they see fit, maybe giving all details and maybe not disclosing all of it, and quite possible they themselves aren't aware of every point of consideration in a staff decision.

I'm getting quite tired of everything being questioned, everyone assuming they are experts in every decision being made. Its getting old quite fast. We make decisions based on our best judgements, often discussing large impacting decisions with several staff members first. You are welcome to report anything you may believe to be unjustified use of GM privileges to the petition forum or Nilbog and myself, but this would only be in situations where you believe a GM did not act as they are instructed so, and an investigation may occur, but do not think that this suddenly privies you to all information associated with any decision. I realize that the environment for our community is a little more open than such organizations as SOE Itself, with more direct involvement in the community by the developers, but there are certain ways things need to be handled, and they wont always be agreed on by everyone, but thats how it is in any scenario. Many of us, including myself, do not play on the server. That means we spend all of our time working to better the server, and handling the issues that arise. We make decisions based on our best judgement, with no favoritism for any play character connections, so you will have to trust in our opinions for the health of the server.

You may now return to your regularly scheduled, un GM-related, flaming and asshatery.

<3

Originally Posted by Server Rules/PnP

o Implying favortism by members of the Project 1999 Staff - Implying that Guides, GM's, or Developers will show favor towards one or more parties involved in any given situation. This includes, but is not limited to, using threats of retribution or inferring that you will not be held accountable for your actions due to special consideration.

[Drakaris]

Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

U can't sign up faggot get to steppen.

Ok sooo... Steppen, get chummy, sign up THEN kick them in the balls?

Seems like too much effort... *rolls eyes*

I think I'd rather hang out their bind points and pick them off while they hold hands in VP! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Out of all seriousness though, I don't mind being an underdog, I MAINED A FRIGGIN NECRO FFS.

[Supreme]

Another guild destroyed by Heartbrand.

[Stasis01]

He seemed trustworthy.

[Stasis01]

Originally Posted by Drakaris [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok sooo... Steppen, get chummy, sign up THEN kick them in the balls?

Seems like too much effort... *rolls eyes*

I think I'd rather hang out their bind points and pick them off while they hold hands in VP! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Out of all seriousness though, I don't mind being an underdog, I MAINED A FRIGGIN NECRO FFS.

I was the equivalent to an african child soldier who just had his family slaughtered, so I joined them till I was stronger.

Fucken pretty much matches.

[Colgate]

Originally Posted by Supreme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Another guild destroyed by Heartbrand.

that's why he's da emp 8)