good job azrael

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by ricquire [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can see it, but everquest was built on a 72 man raid metagame, that was merely an example.

Kunark was not build on a 72 man raid metagame. Neither was Velious. Legacy of Steel / FoH, these guilds weren't raiding 72 deep in Velious, I have no idea where you got that idea. The 72 man thing didn't come in until Planes of Power. If you think somehow raiding dragons that take 19-21 people in Kunark with 72 people, on a server that struggles to break 120 consecutive players on a daily basis is acceptable, than maybe you should just play a game with instances and actual challenging PvE like WoW.

[ricquire]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Kunark was not build on a 72 man raid metagame. Neither was Velious. Legacy of Steel / FoH, these guilds weren't raiding 72 deep in Velious, I have no idea where you got that idea. The 72 man thing didn't come in until Planes of Power. If you think somehow raiding dragons that take 19-21 people in Kunark with 72 people, on a server that struggles to break 120 consecutive players on a daily basis is acceptable, than maybe you should just play a game with instances and actual challenging PvE like WoW.

You are wrong.

Just because the UI did not support the 72 man format does not mean that guilds at that point did not have obscene numbers.

When Vis Maior first killed the content on Quellious, in direct competition with FoH/AL, they had at minimum all times > 50 people.

To say 30 to 40 people is a zerg is not classic EQ.

[Bazia]

GMs are saints you ungrateful fucks

[Sapphiay]

not sure my google english fits here:

Like will to like.

Birds of a feather flock together.

[Kinamara]

Everytime a GM takes action against a player without surefire proof, server gets a little worse.

There's been going such obvious 2-boxing on for so long, and then suddenly GMs hand out account suspensions for thinking someone maybe trained someone, without proof.

Where's the consistency?

I thought for a while, it was starting to brighten up, but then Aussie logs in and flushes it out the shitter. Show us the proof, or apologize!

[Not Salem]

Originally Posted by Kinamaara

Everytime a GM takes action against a player without surefire proof, server gets a little worse.

There's been going such obvious 2-boxing on for so long, and then suddenly GMs hand out account suspensions for thinking someone maybe trained someone, without proof.

Where's the consistency?

I thought for a while, it was starting to brighten up, but then Aussie logs in and flushes it out the shitter. Show us the proof, or apologize!

little late dawg, been suspended 4 times in the last 3 months for things I never did, all petitions by your guild

[Kinamara]

Originally Posted by Not Salem [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

little late dawg, been suspended 4 times in the last 3 months for things I never did, all petitions by your guild

Can you answer on behalf of GMs? With how todays' pvp got destroyed by suspensions, I guess it makes sense, but then again, not really. Personally I've only seen you do shady shit I couldn't explain twice, I didn't petition tho, so I suggest to aim your gun at the right people.

What went down today was just straight up bullshit and if the plan is to aid a guild against pvp with GM interference in the future, I'd like to just have the cards put on the table for everyone to see.

[Colgate]

you can kill anything in kunark with 4 or fewer groups, so bringing 40 people is in fact zerging it

[Not Salem]

30-40 zerg status for sure

[Colgate]

Originally Posted by Not Salem [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

30-40 zerg status for sure

? we called nihilum a zerg 20x a day every day for bringing numbers like that, now suddenly it's not a zerg

ho-kay