Post here every time you are disappointed by no Red 2.0 news

[Tormmac]

honestly i think red owuld have been x100 funner locked in classic

[Gustoo]

Everyone agrees with that if it was 60 people in vanilla
It would be fire right now rubicite BPs and large manhoods

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Gustoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Everyone agrees with that if it was 60 people in vanilla
It would be fire right now rubicite BPs and large manhoods

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Gustoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Everyone agrees with that if it was 60 people in vanilla
It would be fire right now rubicite BPs and large manhoods

/agree

a fresh vanilla server with even just 60 people would be full of meaningful pvp and other player interaction.

would neckbeard.

[Encroaching Death]

Mom says we have Red server at home

[Fammaden]

I wish there was some sort of framework for making everquest servers so people could build their own red instead of begging for P99 to do it.

[magnetaress]

I would prefer red 2.0 to be on the TakP client.

Or the classic Trilogy client.

[Gustoo]

It seems like TAKP client is too good to be true. Do they really have the whole server code from the real live eq Mac server? How is this not a huge deal. It’s way a billion times closer to whatever we have going on with titanium.

[Swish]

TAKP definitely feels more classic ngl

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TAKP definitely feels more classic ngl

having played both p99 and takp extensively, i do agree that TAKP has a classic feel, and p99 has a manufactured feel

especially when you've got pattern recognition super powers and you stare at the melee spam box you can see how clunky melee mechanics are on p99 and how smooth and natural they appear on takp