What IB does after losing again to TMO

[Skywarp]

I shat myself watching this. Many boxes of tide to get these stains out. +1 vid

[Strifer]

Originally Posted by Rev. Al Sharpton [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

...

[Cecily]

P-I-Z-Z-A

[hatelore]

I would literally fucking kill that man/ woman or thing if it burned me like that. Gd that is vicious!!!

[arsenalpow]

So why was Xygoz conceded to IB due to an agreement with TMO. VP still being rotated I guess. Long live competition.

[chief]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So why was Xygoz conceded to IB due to an agreement with TMO. VP still being rotated I guess. Long live competition.

oh he mad

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So why was Xygoz conceded to IB due to an agreement with TMO. VP still being rotated I guess. Long live competition.

??? That was last week. And it's because frapsquest is still alive and well [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] GMs put shitloads of rules in place -> rules get broken -> people provide evidence -> GMs mad they have to look at fraps. lulz.

[sanforce]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So why was Xygoz conceded to IB due to an agreement with TMO. VP still being rotated I guess. Long live competition.

TMO gave up three VP dragons last week and three VP this week due to IB rule lawyers.

Basically, IB got suspended for camping a raid force deep in VP and not wanting to work it out between the two guilds. Then IB dug up some old fraps of someone desyncing and bringing 1 mob to the zone in - which was quickly engaged and dispatched. With quality rule lawyers, they were able to argue that TMO was in the wrong too (sometime in the past, and for something completely unrelated), so the GMs decided to either hand IB 3 mobs 1 weekend and 3 mobs the next weekend, or give TMO a suspension that lasted longer than IBs, which would have defaulted 6 VP mobs and whatever spawned outside of VP to IB.

IB would have probably killed 1 out of the 6 VP mobs over this time span. Instead they get 6 free VP mobs!

See people, this is what quality lawyers are for!

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So why was Xygoz conceded to IB due to an agreement with TMO. VP still being rotated I guess. Long live competition.

We were forced to, because IB was suspended during that repop two weeks ago. During that repop we killed VS, CT, and all of VP. When IB suspension was lifted, it was decided that they missed out on the repop unfairly and they should be given each of those mobs spread across the next two weekends. Last weekend they got CT, druushk, xygoz and PD while the rest of VP was FFA. This weekend they get Nex, silverwing and hosh uncontested.

Competition is alive and well in VP I assure you.

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We were forced to, because IB was suspended during that repop two weeks ago. During that repop we killed VS, CT, and all of VP. When IB suspension was lifted, it was decided that they missed out on the repop unfairly and they should be given each of those mobs spread across the next two weekends. Last weekend they got CT, druushk, xygoz and PD while the rest of VP was FFA. This weekend they get Nex, silverwing and hosh uncontested.

Competition is alive and well in VP I assure you.

Is nexona dead yet btw?