as suspected

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Efwan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

These guilds only came together because we were basically forced to because of your zerg. Don't act stupid troll

What makes you think that a group of 17 capped guilds wouldnt work together?

[Something'Witty]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just for the sake of a counter argument.. the 127 person zerg was 3 guilds teamed up against one... what good would capping the guilds be if everyone is in the same teamspeak and working together anyway?

Hard coded guilds, we will force people to play the game the way we want them to play!

/sarcasm off

[Gardur]

3 diff teamspeaks and 4 diff guilds.

just saying.

[iruinedyourday]

you guys unrustle your jimmies, I'm not making this about what YOU are doing, I'm literately responding to agathas OP, saying if you capped guilds at 17 people a group of 6 guilds WOULD just get in the same TS and it wouldn't make any difference.

[Agatha]

don't know why this is being ignored, the reason holocaust initialy lost is because they all died on DC, then the reason the allies lost was because they still had desynced inside while holo zoned out, cleared the lag and zoned back in with none or less, rinse repeat.

zerg guilds on this server don't allow for fair pvp to decide who gets the dragon on this server.

rules need to be made if the server cant physically handle the battle, we need to limit the scale of the battle.

[Pudge]

Originally Posted by Agatha [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

don't know why this is being ignored, the reason holocaust initialy lost is because they all died on DC, then the reason the allies lost was because they still had desynced inside while holo zoned out, cleared the lag and zoned back in with none or less, rinse repeat.

zerg guilds on this server don't allow for fair pvp to decide who gets the dragon on this server.

rules need to be made if the server cant physically handle the battle, we need to limit the scale of the battle.

agree with the sentiment.. just hard to implement. that being said, adding even minor deterrences are better than nothing. it IS annoying to not be able to use guild chat to communicate between everyone at once... it DOES sow the seeds of separation between different factions within a "guild" if they have different tags and chat. and it WILL be denigrating to the zerg if even the GMs send the message that zerging isn't cool. hopefully new players to the server see this and choose not to join <zerg name #2>

the thing is, everything has a "work around" - the goal is to simply make it not worth it to the perpetrators. ex: throw up a fence -> some ppl will climb it -> put barbed wire -> less ppl get by, but bring a carpet/clippers -> put dogs on the other side, even less ppl going to be interested in going over, etc......

every step in the right direction counts. so sure, cap guild rosters at 80 toons or whatev. better than nothing, right?

[mrproudbeard]

You're being ignored because capping guilds will in no way limit the size of the largest guild. If they are committed to playing with each other, 4 guilds of 30 people working together is the exact same as 1 guild of 120 people working together. Unless you intend on it being hardcoded as impossible to buff/heal/group with anyone outside of your guild as well.

[Buhbuh]

i think he's ignored because he's agatha

[Littlegyno 13.0]

just had to upgrade teamspeak to 200 people.

yowl rdy 4 velly?

[Brutality]

Originally Posted by Littlegyno 13.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just had to upgrade teamspeak to 200 people.

yowl rdy 4 velly?