I wanna start over

[eqravenprince]

I don't even like competing with other players for content. I definitely wouldn't like getting killed by other players.

[Gustoo]

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't even like competing with other players for content. I definitely wouldn't like getting killed by other players.

Red 1.0 is the place for you for no competition, its stable with good classic database and no competition. The ideal server to explore a classic like experience.

Red 2.0 will be for people looking to have a significantly more classic experience mostly because of the additional amount of players.

[magnetaress]

yep plz cap eq pvp server at lvl 40 and vanilla

item loots

and no planar action unless u r g-dlike which u ar not ur just an elf

[Goldknyght]

Red 2.0 is destined to fail. No one will play it outside of first week at best. PvP in EQ is terrible. guess these are troll posts, cuz green 5.0 will happen before a red 2.0 is even thought about.

[Jibartik]

99th times a charm

[Gustoo]

All servers die. Not every server truly lives.

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Gustoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All servers die. Not every server truly lives.

[SummerYU]

Hi, I also want team PVP, any suggestion?

[MaddiusTheMad]

New Red server with vanilla lock at launch! team pvp and open registry among so many players would create a whole new perspective of PVP servers, you'd gain a lot of new pvp server loyalists and casuals. Do red 2.0 or Magenta/Ruby/Orange/Pink/Wine w.e

[Cen]

I don't weigh in much on PvP discussion, and I've never played red, but I did play rallos zek on live classic primarily and went to sullon when it released for a year or so.

If a PvP server showed up that was popular I'd be on it, but if a bunch of folks like me out there think the same way it would never work since we're waiting for everyone else to show up lol