Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2024, 09:21 PM
Reiwa Reiwa is offline
Planar Protector

Reiwa's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 5,178
Default

Tigger warning
__________________
A learned fool is more foolish than an ignorant fool.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2024, 01:22 PM
Namsaknoi Namsaknoi is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 26
Default

According to Allakhazam posts, it looks like the dude has high hp regen as well.
Even assuming the quest was pre-Kunark quest, and that he hit for 156, had 16khp and no regen, vs hitting for 356, with 32khp, and regen, it still is a ridiculous quest. It seems like you get about -500 faction hit, while getting a couple of +50 faction hit for the quest givers.

Regarding AGI, it was basically 9AGI = 1AC regardless of your class, and the below 75agi penalty, and that it helped with raising defensive abilities faster, and that it had hard cap of 255 like any other skills, I dunno if it had any softcap, so yes, pretty useless. Even less effective on P99 as AC isn't as effective here compared to live.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2024, 07:54 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,342
Default

I'm gonna say the monk sparring armor quest in cabilis.

I have a monk I've been hunting down pretty rare escaped frog slaves on for years.

It takes a hell of a lot of shackles to make one combine attempt. And as you receive more and more rewards the chances of getting one you don't already have get slimmer.

I started the quest for a full set in December 2012. I'm on my last piece now. The monk is level 12 - would be higher from years of killing froglok fishers and stuff ... if it wasn't for all the random high level kos mobs that path into the newbie area in SONH maybe he would be 13 haha

An optimistic estimate each escaped frog takes 15 mins of work to find, 6 frogs are needed per combine attempt. Lets say 30 hand ins total must be made to get each of the 10 rewards (i'll foolishly trust ai on this one), that is like 50 hours of play to complete this armor set (which isn't even a complete set of armor!!)

edit: feck a SoWed gaz warrior just ran up on me [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Just about kept level 12
Last edited by Jimjam; 12-10-2024 at 08:11 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2024, 02:22 PM
Ciderpress Ciderpress is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 512
Default

The itemization of classic (less so in kunark and velious) literally seems like there was no communication between different dev teams at all. Putting +int and no +wis on priest gear either means you're doing it on purpose as a troll, or you have no idea how the game you're ostensibly supposed to help make works.

It's like the original release was somehow a fan remake of itself, with all the guesswork that would entail.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2024, 04:10 PM
WarpathEQ WarpathEQ is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The itemization of classic (less so in kunark and velious) literally seems like there was no communication between different dev teams at all. Putting +int and no +wis on priest gear either means you're doing it on purpose as a troll, or you have no idea how the game you're ostensibly supposed to help make works.

It's like the original release was somehow a fan remake of itself, with all the guesswork that would entail.
Maybe they just wanted a community full of well adjusted, rounded individuals that would work together to create utopia.

Maybe they foresaw some crazy min max meta that we have yet to discover where core stats were so plentiful that neglected stats become the thing to collect. Kinda like how stamina is for non-tank melee in 2024.

Or just maybe they wanted to capture the quirkiness of a "dungeon master" that might make decisions for his own amusement. Or enstill that all actions/decisions don't lead to positive outcomes.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2024, 09:52 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The itemization of classic (less so in kunark and velious) literally seems like there was no communication between different dev teams at all. Putting +int and no +wis on priest gear either means you're doing it on purpose as a troll, or you have no idea how the game you're ostensibly supposed to help make works.

It's like the original release was somehow a fan remake of itself, with all the guesswork that would entail.
I like that the classic gears included 'useless' stats.

It didn't make sense that a very powerful, experienced priest whose abilities are hightened beyond what is natural to also be incredibly mediocrely intelligent. The level 50 cleric should be fairly intelligent, even if it doesn't improve their mana.

Perhaps the real mistake was having stats with zero impact. Really they could have just merged int/wis.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2024, 01:33 PM
Goregasmic Goregasmic is offline
Sarnak

Goregasmic's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Perhaps the real mistake was having stats with zero impact. Really they could have just merged int/wis.
True. I think technically you could be an int healer or a wis purecaster but itemization won't let you be any good doing so. Merge them or make them affect resists and mana regen so you have a reason to raise both or at least not have a stat entirely wasted.

I don't think agi/dex have enough of an impact to warrant being their own thing either. They could be merged or made better.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2024, 02:22 PM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goregasmic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
True. I think technically you could be an int healer or a wis purecaster but itemization won't let you be any good doing so. Merge them or make them affect resists and mana regen so you have a reason to raise both or at least not have a stat entirely wasted.

I don't think agi/dex have enough of an impact to warrant being their own thing either. They could be merged or made better.
Good point. dex doesn't really make a difference when low, agi doesn't make a difference when high. If you merge them they kinda have different phases of use across the spectrum. I like it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2024, 09:39 PM
Eisai Eisai is offline
Sarnak

Eisai's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 214
Default

Op maybe wins. Until someone posts a quest with a higher target and/or a lower reward. "yes, and" is not valid in the debate. Sure eq has some dumb ones but ATM they are winning...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2024, 08:15 PM
jolanar jolanar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eisai [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Op maybe wins. Until someone posts a quest with a higher target and/or a lower reward. "yes, and" is not valid in the debate. Sure eq has some dumb ones but ATM they are winning...
The only thing I can think of is that at some point in development the class trainers were lower level and easier to kill.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.