![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
MW3 sucks anyways
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
you paid RL money for those games nobody payed for the PP that they would trade you. No need to have rules rewritten its called common sense.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#13
|
||||
|
Quote:
You are a hostage in a bank, along with a handful of other people. A small army of disciplined, trained, armed, and armored men has taken over the bank, is trying to break into the vault, and have guns pointed. The head honcho did mention, though, that they expected to have the safe open within a couple hours, and that after that they will let you go because they have a secret escape plan that doesn't require hostages! After 5 hours have passed, you start mumbling about how the head honcho terrorist bank robber militiamember (who, remember, holds your life in his hands) said he was going to let you go 3 hours ago. Three of four of the other hostages whisper your way, "Shut the hell up. They probably just haven't got the vault open yet." You reply, "Well I'm not going to be quiet until they tell me first-hand why we haven't been released yet!" And you stand up and start walking over towards the head honcho with a smug look of confidence on your face, knowing that he is breaking his own rule! And then you get shot, and you die, because you were dumb. The end. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#14
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#15
|
|||
|
dude your just digging yourself a deeper hole.....
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#16
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#17
|
|||
|
Not going to trade until i can get a Mod to comment on the manner.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
This has been covered before. It's against the rules. No mod needs to come here and tell it to you personally, because you're the one who's failed to perform your due diligence and ensure what you're doing is legal.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#19
|
||||
|
The very same Rules Threads includes this clarification a few posts down:
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#20
|
|||
|
So reading the trade forum rules wasn't "due diligence"? So many bad opinions on this thread not backed by anything but pure opinion. But i guess you are to cool to link "This has been covered before" posts. At the very least i linked the rule and have an argument against it with valid facts.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|