Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Gloomlord]

Why do you keep linking that? I told you -- and nearly everyone else told you -- that a solo parse is not accurate to a mob dying to two enchanter charms in a group.

Oh, I see! It's because you're trying to be as annoying as possible, right?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why do you keep linking that? I told you -- and nearly everyone else told you -- that a solo parse is not accurate to a mob dying to two enchanter charms in a group.

Oh, I see! It's because you're trying to be as annoying as possible, right?

You have never explained why. You just keep saying it is not accurate.

I could do the same thing, and we would be at an impasse. The only person being annoying here is yourself, because you know you can't actually explain why you think it's wrong.

[Gloomlord]

I was addressing PNB through your quote, you idiot.

He admitted he was trolling, even though he said it's because you were such a prick you deserved it.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I was addressing PNB through your quote, you idiot.

He admitted he was trolling, even though he said it's because you were such a prick you deserved it.

You are also admitting to trolling. You are so angry at what I have said you think I deserve being insulted. How petty.

If you disagree, just say so and move on. This says more about you than it does about me.

[PlsNoBan]

Reminder for the mass group of silent readers. DSM has discredited himself by a clear contradiction to his 700+ post argument and refusal to acknowledge it and admit he was wrong. He is now in full deflect mode and will say anything to dodge the fact that he contradicted himself. His favorites so far are: Whining about people being trolls or insulting him, talking about how his solo data is relevant for some reason, pretending his contradiction was out of context when it very clearly was not. I'm not a doctor but some form of mental illness seems very likely. I genuinely wish he would give this thread a rest for the sake of his own health.

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He's now admitted that mage is better at royals and necro is better at fungi king. He's basically just clinging on to shaman being helpful for ixiblat and maybe like WW dragons? He's backed himself into a very tiny corner with his own words at this point. Would ANYBODY base their entire group makeup for 1-60 and beyond around what class makes more sense for Ixiblat? Or would you take a mage/necro that makes more sense in the vast majority of cases? I played actively on blue for YEARS and I think I killed Ixiblat like twice.

This thread really should be over. I know it won't end. But DSM literally backed himself into a tiny corner and the floor has fallen out beneath him. He's dangling by a thread and is going to continue to argue from there I'm sure.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I said all of this before, you just aren't reading, as usual. You simply have this strange straw man that I am obsessed with Shamans.

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Okay so we've established shaman has no place in this hypothetical best 4 man caster group outside of a niche mob or two. You keep bringing up Ixiblat which is one of very few situations where I think shaman might be helpful.

There ya have it boys and girls. If you want the best 4 man caster group for Ixiblat and maybe 1-2 other things put a shaman in there. For 1-60 and 95% of everything else at 60 pick something else.

End of thread.

[Gloomlord]

I didn't admit to trolling; I admitted to being angry with you.

Can't even concede to this misconstruction either. How predictable...

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I didn't admit to trolling; I admitted to being angry with you.

Can't even concede to this misconstruction either. How predictable...

Exactly. You are angry at me, which is why you are posting insults instead of backing up your points with evidence and logic. I am sorry, but that is trolling. You haven't contributed anything.

[Karanis]

DSM: 1+1=3

Everyone: No it doesn't, you absolute dumbfuck.

DSM: Uhh, yes it does, and you're totally wrong because you insulted me!

Everyone:
HUH.jpg

[Gloomlord]

Originally Posted by Karanis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM: 1+1=3

Everyone: No it doesn't, you absolute dumbfuck.

DSM: Uhh, yes it does, and you're totally wrong because you insulted me!

Everyone:
Attachment 18727

Everyone: Shaman solo DPS is not indicative of a shaman's DPS capabilities in a group with two charms.

DSM: Uhhhh, yes, it is! That takes out all the variables!

Everyone: But then how is that parse accurate to the discussion at hand?

DSM: My solo parse is the most accurate we're getting to the truth!

Everyone: I don't know, that sounds kind of stupid to us.

DSM: INSULTS! ALL YOU HAVE ARE INSULTS! TROLLS!

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Everyone: Shaman solo DPS is not indicative of a shaman's DPS capabilities in a group with two charms.

DSM: Uhhhh, yes, it is! That takes out all the variables!

Everyone: But then how is that parse accurate to the discussion at hand?

DSM: My solo parse is the most accurate we're getting to the truth!

Everyone: I don't know, that sounds kind of stupid to us.

DSM: INSULTS! ALL YOU HAVE ARE INSULTS! TROLLS!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]