Beastlords on p99

[webrunner5]

Oh come on! After Velious has been out for 2 years you will all jump at the chance to play a Beastlord. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Bantam 1]

Originally Posted by senna [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ssra temple is one of the GOAT eq zones

Only reason EQ didn't die then and there (other than people not wanting to part with their effort).

[Weekapaug]

Loved Ssra

[kaev]

Originally Posted by cukazi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

voting yes just to anger the "It's not classic" gods.

This is the only valid reason to vote yes. It's a strong reason, but in my case simply not enough to overcome my innate revulsion towards beastlords (and cats on the moon.)

[mcappy]

I voted yes because a Beastlord was my first (and only non-poweleveled) level 60 on live, it'd feel like a betrayal otherwise.

Side note: Beastlords were kinda shitty, at least when I played - less dps than any other dps class, ranger-esque heals and buffs and a "persistent" pet that was like 30 levels below you until you buffed it. The only reason people liked me was because I was the first guy in my guild (maybe the first guy on SZ evil team?) with SP and SS.

Not that I think it will or should actually happen.

[fastboy21]

original beastlords weren't rlly very useful. the paragon line was about their only unique ability that raids could make use of.

its a fun class...personally, though, i'd rather box a monk/shaman duo than play a beastlord.

[Sulfurian]

Voted yes, because i used to play a BST on live.

[Estolcles]

As the saying goes:

Not classic.

[Estu]

*insert Swish's goat gif here*

[Glasken]

Originally Posted by senna [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lets face it, classes are getting stale. P1999 needs to get on the beastlord wagon

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


We don't need their scum here.