One last point though.

[LostCause]

that shit is buillshit getting suspended for dispelling is this fucking blue? no... they are in range they can easily do something... so adding new rules to the list?

[Pseudechis]

Woodelf Ragnarok Stasis Kael Drakkel XXX 5.28 4/3/17 11:52:00 PM


Yikes......1v1 honour duel between rogues in mithril...

[Gustoo]

Cylock I don't see the word dispell in the PNP

Can you please add clarification

I think in range players can do whatever they want right?

When you say someone needs a raid force u need to then define that very specifically and also what if he has raid force at the ready on batphone rather than actually online or other dumb things.

[Cylock]

Originally Posted by Gustoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cylock I don't see the word dispell in the PNP

Can you please add clarification

I think in range players can do whatever they want right?

When you say someone needs a raid force u need to then define that very specifically and also what if he has raid force at the ready on batphone rather than actually online or other dumb things.

This right there tells me SOME of you guys don't read anything we post. Its all there ...

Originally Posted by Cylock [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

4/5/17: Since some of you just don't get it, I figured I would post it here as a reminder so you don't forget.

To encourage more actual PvP combat and less just griefing each other, and due to the previous standard of a couple players interfering with a raid target while having no actual raid or PvP force present in game to contest or kill, we have added this rule:

"A player that interferes with a raid target with no raid force present to kill or contest the target is against the rules and will be addressed swiftly."

It says interferes for a reason, because I know how you guys like to split hairs and rule lawyer.

This is you some of you guys in a nutshell ...

Person says hey I wouldn't go down that road if I was you, the other guy just looks down the road and goes anyway. Five minutes later the guy is in a head on collision for going down a one way street the wrong way. But then wants to blame the other guy for not telling him *exactly*. Give me a break.

[funnland]

Originally Posted by Cylock [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This right there tells me SOME of you guys don't read anything we post. Its all there ...



It says interferes for a reason, because I know how you guys like to split hairs and rule lawyer.

This is you some of you guys in a nutshell ...

Person says hey I wouldn't go down that road if I was you, the other guy just looks down the road and goes anyway. Five minutes later the guy is in a head on collision for going down a one way street the wrong way. But then wants to blame the other guy for not telling him *exactly*. Give me a break.

We just want to be clear.

If a single player zones in and attacks a cleric. Does that count as interfering without a raid force?

[funnland]

Well at least Cylock put this in writing now.

EDIT:

I agree with the above poster. Can we add the word dispel, and add clarification in terms of interrupting the actual raid mob and not the players fighting it.

[MEGANS LAW]

wanting 2 buy rare pixels with runed mithril tunics pst on skype

[Gustoo]

Thanks cylock im just trying to drag out maximum clarity. It looks like guilds will have to actually war for raid targets rather than just ruin enemy raids with single player disruption moving forward.

Raid force not fully defined but I'm sure if enemy has two groups as warriors / scouts pelling and trashing a raid they would be doing legitimate battle so it's not a problem

[Pseudechis]

Originally Posted by Gustoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thanks cylock im just trying to drag out maximum clarity. It looks like guilds will have to actually war for raid targets rather than just ruin enemy raids with single player disruption moving forward.

Raid force not fully defined but I'm sure if enemy has two groups as warriors / scouts pelling and trashing a raid they would be doing legitimate battle so it's not a problem

yes is there something wrong with this. FYI we won't raid past midnight and generally not on weekends (or at least I won't). So you could like I dunno just raid between midnight and midday EST or weekends?

Why didn't Apex concede tormax and go hit dain or yeli yesterday? Would of been the smarter play....

[funnland]

Originally Posted by Pseudechis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why didn't Apex concede tormax and go hit dain or yeli yesterday? Would of been the smarter play....

I wanted to, as did many other Apex members.

On the other hand, what happened in Kael yesterday is like a small taste of what has been directed towards our guild over the last 12 months, so I think some people just wanted to do that instead.