Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

View Poll Results: How do you feel about Enchanter's power level? Multiple choice allowed.
Non-classically overpowered and needs nerf 66 33.33%
Non-classically overpowered and does not need nerf 19 9.60%
Classically overpowered and needs nerf (Bard, Nec, etc examples) 23 11.62%
Classically overpowered and does not need nerf 88 44.44%
Trivializes content and needs nerf 42 21.21%
Trivializes content and does not need nerf 16 8.08%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 198. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2021, 07:36 PM
surron surron is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 302
Default

I agree, but dont think there would be any reason for eqmac devs to touch charm logic in the few years it was in true development.

In any case, his parses from Al'Kabor match pretty high charm rates - but not really much data in terms of mob diversity.

who knows what p99 has done to the eqemu charm logic. I do know it's different than eqemu because apparently on p99 cha effects charm duration - which isn't a true mechanic (it should only affect initial cast.) Can't find the evidence Torven has from eqmac. who knows if that makes charm shorter/longer on p99 though.

I think the only true changes you'll see get implemented that effect charm duration on p99 are evidence of higher MR on certain mobs but that's hard to come by.
__________________
Surron / Geom
  #2  
Old 03-24-2021, 08:25 PM
DMN DMN is offline
Planar Protector

DMN's Avatar

Join Date: May 2016
Location: My own special hell
Posts: 3,364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by surron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I agree, but dont think there would be any reason for eqmac devs to touch charm logic in the few years it was in true development.

In any case, his parses from Al'Kabor match pretty high charm rates - but not really much data in terms of mob diversity.

who knows what p99 has done to the eqemu charm logic. I do know it's different than eqemu because apparently on p99 cha effects charm duration - which isn't a true mechanic (it should only affect initial cast.) Can't find the evidence Torven has from eqmac. who knows if that makes charm shorter/longer on p99 though.

I think the only true changes you'll see get implemented that effect charm duration on p99 are evidence of higher MR on certain mobs but that's hard to come by.
Eh, I certainly haven't seen any solid evidence cha has a statistically significant effect on charm duration yet so /shrug. Maybe they do have it implemented as such. Hour or two of charming with 30 some charm breaks is nothing when testing something that can break in 1 second or last 15 mins.
  #3  
Old 03-25-2021, 12:54 AM
azxten azxten is offline
Fire Giant

azxten's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by surron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I agree, but dont think there would be any reason for eqmac devs to touch charm logic in the few years it was in true development.

In any case, his parses from Al'Kabor match pretty high charm rates - but not really much data in terms of mob diversity.

who knows what p99 has done to the eqemu charm logic. I do know it's different than eqemu because apparently on p99 cha effects charm duration - which isn't a true mechanic (it should only affect initial cast.) Can't find the evidence Torven has from eqmac. who knows if that makes charm shorter/longer on p99 though.

I think the only true changes you'll see get implemented that effect charm duration on p99 are evidence of higher MR on certain mobs but that's hard to come by.
Unfortunate, most of what you're saying fits with what I was reading though.

Enchanters complaining about charm breaking fast on green mobs back in 1999. Fits with the same thing being said.

Also specific mentions about mob MR and that Enchanters believed mob MR scaled with their level so that Enchanters were slowly less able to control mobs as they got higher level.

I do think mob MR and it's impact on charm may be a major thing that is missing. On my Enchanter I only bothered to tash yellow+ mobs but reading classic era posts everyone talks about tash being a requirement even on blues.

Any P99 devs have anything to add to this conversation?
  #4  
Old 03-24-2021, 09:24 PM
magnetaress magnetaress is offline
Planar Protector

magnetaress's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Inside of you.
Posts: 10,241
Default

Prove it.
  #5  
Old 03-25-2021, 03:12 AM
soxetaqo soxetaqo is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 2
Default

Non-classically overpowered and needs nerf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #6  
Old 03-25-2021, 03:12 AM
soxetaqo soxetaqo is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 2
Default

oops, I mean
Non-classically overpowered and does not need nerf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #7  
Old 03-25-2021, 04:10 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,466
Default

It’s funny how statements from 30 years ago are taken as fact when they support what the whiney OP wants done.

Know what else you can find from 20 years ago? People saying that pets steal exp from groups. People saying that the lowest level in the group gets the most exp. If you’re a Druid killing animals could decrease your chance to charm animals of the same type. There were incorrect statements about AGI and Dex. Looting corpses fully sped up a mob’s spawn timer. All kinds of incorrect statements on placeholders, spawn times, pathing, etc. And again, all kinds of contradictory statements about CHA and charming.

Old posts are worthless as evidence
  #8  
Old 03-25-2021, 06:41 PM
bwe bwe is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 246
Default

Ah yes, "nothing" is definitely worth more as evidence than uh, evidence
  #9  
Old 03-25-2021, 07:16 PM
bubur bubur is offline
Planar Protector

bubur's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,474
Default

how many votes are required to forcibly class change every enchanter into rangers

i know some ppl who may cast some mail-in ballots if you give me a target
  #10  
Old 03-25-2021, 09:26 PM
Seducio Seducio is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,343
Default

Why does the poll add up to 128.92% upon 'view results'?

Sounds like a bug in calculation algorithm for poll total
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.