Shadow knight aggro

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Guesty07 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What an idiot. Guy really said spamming taunt is BETTER than using it appropriately ROFL

We got ourselves another DSM thread.

Lol.

30+ pages of extra horse shit since I last posted.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We got ourselves another DSM thread.

Lol.

30+ pages of extra horse shit since I last posted.

Why bother posting this? You haven't disproven anything I have said, and you look like a troll at the same time. You're doing yourself and the community zero favors. You're also not hurting me. Keep this in RnF please.

[Troxx]

Lol this is my first post since page 2. The last 32 pages has been all you man.

Congrats on ruining another thread.

Spamming taunt when you’re at the top of the threat list is stupid.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol this is my first post since page 2. The last 32 pages has been all you man.

Congrats on ruining another thread.

Spamming taunt when you’re at the top of the threat list is stupid.

Saying something is stupid is not an arguement. Come back when you have an argument. I am sorry you think having a discussion is a problem on a forum.

Troll posts like this are the only problem here.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I understand this button is a lot less crucial for knights but damn … this isn’t rocket surgery. If you’re already at the top of the aggro list, it does nothing. If you constantly spam it there’s a one in six chance you won’t have it up the instant you need it most … with a 1-5 second wait before you can use it again. If it fails the first time, you now have a 7-11 second wait for the second taunt instead of a faster 6 second 2nd attempt.

That’s why it is stupid.

I stated the “why” 32 pages ago. Regardless, no amount of logic or reason will ever convince you of anything once you have dug in a position. Heck, we’ve since had 32 pages of people trying.

This is the perfect example of a “DSM Thread”.

This is a weird hill to die on. Arguably your stupidest ever … and that is saying a lot.

[Penish]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why bother posting this? You haven't disproven anything I have said, and you look like a troll at the same time. You're doing yourself and the community zero favors. You're also not hurting me. Keep this in RnF please.

literally 25 or so people have disproven you in this thread, congrats retard

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That’s why it is stupid.

I stated the “why” 32 pages ago. Regardless, no amount of logic or reason will ever convince you of anything once you have dug in a position. Heck, we’ve since had 32 pages of people trying.

This is the perfect example of a “DSM Thread”.

This is a weird hill to die on. Arguably your stupidest ever … and that is saying a lot.

I already factually disproved all of the arguments you made on page 2 here: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=140

What else do you have argument-wise? So far "you are stupid" is all you have, which is irrelevant.

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Exactly. You provide no counter points and just troll. Please stop. It is ok to be wrong.

[Crede]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Exactly. You provide no counter points and just troll. Please stop. It is ok to be wrong.

Correction. You failed to provide any evidence that spam taunt is worth the ~5% it will actually succeed and fire at the exact moment you need it.

It’s odd that you claim 170 str is “good enough” on your monk denouncing the dps gains that would come from more str yet you think somehow that ~5% taunt chance has any actual value.

This is your fundamental flaw and it’s why you can’t win any debates. You throw random pieces of data at the wall and hope it sticks, but you simply lack the ability to formulate truly effective arguments. There’s a reason lawyers have paralegals. Leave the actual arguments for the big boys.