Lock Server Until an Agreement is Met - Page 4

Elements · #31 12-31-2013, 07:21 PM

I really see no reason why having alts in multiple guilds should be an offence and I see no server rules against it. If a person has the time to level, gear, and raid with multiple toons in multiple guilds then they should be able to. If these people want to see the outcome of a bag limit, or point system or some other "I am a person and therefor deserver equity" -based system then let them see the outcome of everyone having multiple toons in multiple guilds by months end once such a system is implemented. And for those claiming the GMs could police it.... you are fools. VPN, multiple IPs... shit just will not work.

Alarti0001 · #32 12-31-2013, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aaron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who are the other raid guilds? Lord Bob is the only one I can think of.

By raid guilds, I assume it's a guild that raids, which is planes, epic mobs, etc.

I guess your definition of a raid guild is different than others
Planar clears aren't raids. 1 group content.

So raid guilds FE/IB/TMO/BDA/Taken.

3v2

Aaron · #33 12-31-2013, 07:29 PM

I don't know what you're trying to say, but I was asking a question as to the other raid guilds you're speaking about.

I don't know why you're tied up in semantics. Who are the raid guilds?

This isn't RnF and I'm not trying to argue with you. Don't know why you guys turn every thread into RnF.

HeallunRumblebelly · #34 12-31-2013, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I guess your definition of a raid guild is different than others
Planar clears aren't raids. 1 group content.

So raid guilds FE/IB/TMO/BDA/Taken.

3v2

Aye, but if there was a full rotation, imagine how many more guilds would actually raid. It's a miracle that taken / divinity and such are still cohesive guilds with impetus to get targets with how locked down the raid scene is atm.

Alarti0001 · #35 12-31-2013, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aaron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't know what you're trying to say, but I was asking a question as to the other raid guilds you're speaking about.

I don't know why you're tied up in semantics. Who are the raid guilds?

This isn't RnF and I'm not trying to argue with you. Don't know why you guys turn every thread into RnF.

How is this RnF? I was providing an example of this "majority" Catherin claims he has. She labels them as raid guilds based on her definition of what a raid guild is. When is the last time AG or A-team killed a raid-mob prior to suspensions?

We aren't making a planar clear rotation here.

Nune · #36 12-31-2013, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aaron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who are the other raid guilds? Lord Bob is the only one I can think of.

By raid guilds, I assume it's a guild that raids, which is planes, epic mobs, etc.

Our guild is a raid guild by that definition. Thousand times over.

"Raid guilds" in the big boy context should be guilds capable of killing a dragon from out of zone mobilization -> to said dragon

Alarti0001 · #37 12-31-2013, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeallunRumblebelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Aye, but if there was a full rotation, imagine how many more guilds would actually raid. It's a miracle that taken / divinity and such are still cohesive guilds with impetus to get targets with how locked down the raid scene is atm.

That is exactly my point. Catherin's definition of what a "raid guild" is has no value. Her majority isn't proven in the slightest and is moot at best.

Byrjun · #38 12-31-2013, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When is the last time AG or A-team killed a raid-mob prior to suspensions?

Let us have next CT and I'm pretty sure we'll have no problem killing it. I don't get what point you're trying to make, are you suggesting that the majority of guilds can't kill 32k mobs that hit for like 500 at most?

Alarti0001 · #39 12-31-2013, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Byrjun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let us have next CT and I'm pretty sure we'll have no problem killing it. I don't get what point you're trying to make, are you suggesting that the majority of guilds can't kill 32k mobs that hit for like 500 at most?

Read further

Nune · #40 12-31-2013, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Byrjun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let us have next CT and I'm pretty sure we'll have no problem killing it. I don't get what point you're trying to make, are you suggesting that the majority of guilds can't kill 32k mobs that hit for like 500 at most?

His definition isn't about being able to kill a raid mob, it's about being able to do it before a different guild does or doing it faster than another guild when they're moving in / mobilizing to it.

Will ditto our guild could pop 32k targets in the NEAR future. We have to round most of us out to 60 and recruit a few more key classes. Which is why I dont give a fuck about this rotation / agreement bullshit. Gives 0 accountancy to my type of guild, newer than the established regulars. We've downed zones/targets Lord bob has wiped on with 1/6th of their numbers