Waco TV series

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

koresh begat mcveigh who begat dylan roof who begat the bowl cut prince

*suddenly examines thread with newfound interest*

[mickmoranis]

I recommend this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unin...quences_(novel)

Scripture.

Waco episode 2 was fire.

[mickmoranis]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[mickmoranis]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that other link dont work, here is the book yall should read if you wana get really woke instead of just pop culture woke.

this book, often found in the homes of domestic terrorists, is about the cult that has taken over the country and brainwashed you into thinking its right, ironically, the same way david koresh's followers thought he was.

by the way, good luck getting your hands on an acual copy, theyre quite expensive but worth the money for a collector and fan of true freedom, you can read it online though: https://billstclair.com/Unintended-Consequences.pdf

[mickmoranis]

Libtard hypocracy:

Defiance that is OK

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Defiance that is absolutely NOT OK

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Pokesan]

uhh the bundy movement was because he refused to pay cattle grazing fees on public land

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

uhh the bundy movement was because he refused to pay cattle grazing fees on public land

that partly is correct, that land is not owned by anyone, including a bureaucratic agency, why would someone pay to use it. These ranchers have been using that land for grazing for generations.

The standoff was becuse the bureacratic agency was trying to put outragous fines on the rancher to unfairlyl punish him for breaking a beurocratic law that he and the people of the area did not subscribe to: "law enforcement following a 21-year legal dispute in which the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) obtained court orders directing Bundy to pay over $1 million in withheld grazing fees"

It was the law of the LOCAL land, all the ranchers there agreed. However the FEDERAL Government didnt. And so they tried to infringe on their constitutional rights.

It was theft using overreaching goverment.

Think about it: You support indians having a stand off with a buisness entity that purchased the right to land, but you dont support individuals who have been using un owned land for generations to suddenly owe back payment to the goverment who claim they own the land.

Land is owned if someone buys it not if the goverment just tells you its theirs. this is not the king of englands right to hunt only type of country, you go there if you want to be told what to do and when to do it.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that partly is correct, that land is not owned by anyone, including a bureaucratic agency, why would someone pay to use it. These ranchers have been using that land for generations.

The movement was becuse the bureacratic agency was trying to incracerate him and unfairlyl punish him for breaking a beurocratic law that he and the people of the area did not subscribe to.

It was the law of the LOCAL land, all the ranchers there agreed. However the FEDERAL Government didnt. And so they tried to infringe on their constitutional rights.

local law is irrelevant, federal supremacy u tard

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

local law is irrelevant, federal supremacy u tard

that is the point, federal supremacy is an attack on the very concept of the united states. But you are brainwashed into the cult of buzzfeed to think you need a goverment telling you how to live and think and to solve all your worries.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that is the point, federal supremacy is an attack on the very concept of the united states. But you are brainwashed into the cult of buzzfeed to think you need a goverment telling you how to live and think and to solve all your worries.

Supremacy Clause

The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.[1] It provides that state courts are bound by the supreme law; in case of conflict between federal and state law, the federal law must be applied. Even state constitutions are subordinate to federal law.[2] In essence, it is a conflict-of-laws rule specifying that certain federal acts take priority over any state acts that conflict with federal law. In this respect, the Supremacy Clause follows the lead of Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, which provided that "Every State shall abide by the determination of the United States in Congress Assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them."[3] A constitutional provision announcing the supremacy of federal law, the Supremacy Clause assumes the underlying priority of federal authority, at least when that authority is expressed in the Constitution itself.[4] No matter what the federal government or the states might wish to do, they have to stay within the boundaries of the Constitution. This makes the Supremacy Clause the cornerstone of the whole American political structure.[5][6]