A reply to a thread in the Raid Discussion section.

[YendorLootmonkey]

Originally Posted by Nune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yendor just owned this thread hard

Feel free to link to the post in the official 1/1/1 Proposal Discussion, along with this:

That's even without Ute pointing out to me via PMs a little bit ago the special case of VP mobs, which, if included on the re-pop plan (Rogean/nilbog never specified they wouldn't), Class C guilds not only go from 4.3 to 4.86 spawns of a particular 7-day +/- 48hr non-VP mob, as an added benefit they go from 4.3 to 7.3 spawns of each VP mob in a 30-day cycle because they have the opportunity to compete for those every time they spawn. That's 18 extra VP dragons they are getting every 30 days from the 1/1/1 plan, plus more non-VP opportunities. Yet they are focused on limiting the Class R guilds on what is essentially an entirely new set of mobs being added to the mix. Class C wants in on those too? Unbelieveable.

Based on the above numbers, any hardcore that rejects this 1/1/1 plan as a concept is just trying to deny pixels to Class R with no detriment to the amount of opportunities that Class C is being provided.

[radditsu]

Boom mathshot.

[Kadron]

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So there you have it. The hardcore's reluctance to accept the 1/1/1 plan in which they get the opportunity to compete for more mobs than they already do is all about denying pixels to others. We have mathematical proof that under Rogean's plan they would get the opportunity to compete against 4.86 spawns a month compared to the 4.3 they have had the opportunity to compete for in the past.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[JayN]

This is retarded; staff want a solution with rules that only they can only enforce, but they dont want to have to enforce it?

Shut this server down imo...


How goes Velious?

[knix]

Originally Posted by JayN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is retarded; staff want a solution with rules that only they can only enforce, but they dont want to have to enforce it?

Shut this server down imo...

easy to enforce Sirken -b plan, VS hard to enforce 1 1 1 rotation plan proposed by Rogean.

[Uteunayr]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can't count to three, plan is hard bros.

^

[knix]

I wondered if all these posts would poof too

[JayN]

1 2 3 plan is bawls GG

[YendorLootmonkey]

Here's the Excel spreadsheet I was using to simulate 25000 spawns if anyone wants to pick it apart or mess with it. You can change that "Max hours Class R has to kill a mob" value from 8 to whatever. Class C and FFA mobs are assumed to die within an hour, based on P99 raiding history. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] This does not include the extra 3 re-pops per month on average, I just wanted to get a feel for how a delay in killing every third spawn might impact the spawns per month on the non-"forced full re-pop" spawns. The answer was: Not much.

http://www.filedropper.com/spawns