I have conquered Alarti.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

prove it

Logical fallacy.

Argument from ignorance (Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance stands for "lack of evidence to the contrary"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false (or vice versa).

I don't have to prove it because he never proved he received the PMs in the first place.

[Ezalor]

Originally Posted by White Ranger Revival

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Fame]

remember when kids played outside?

[Champion_Standing]

Originally Posted by Fame [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

remember when kids played outside?

Not really

[kaev]

Originally Posted by Champion_Standing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not really

Not surprising. That was back in the days of stone knives and bearskins. You gotta be a real dinosaur and also have some luck fending off the alzheimer's to remember crazy shit like that.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Logical fallacy.

Argument from ignorance (Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance stands for "lack of evidence to the contrary"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false (or vice versa).

I don't have to prove it because he never proved he received the PMs in the first place.

You made a claim. Prove your claim. That fallacy isn't relevant. You can be skeptical of Heebo's claim.. you can't claim it's wrong however... unless you prove it :P

basics kid basics

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That fallacy isn't relevant.

This is where you're mistaken. You repeatedly choose to use argument from ignorance to your benefit, but it's time to call BS. It does not put the onus on anybody else to prove you wrong by simply taking the stance that it cannot be true until they prove it so. Your "prove it" meme is officially dead, and it has been killed by your very own "logical fallacy" meme used against you.

Time to move on, kid.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is where you're mistaken. You repeatedly choose to use argument from ignorance to your benefit, but it's time to call BS. It does not put the onus on anybody else to prove you wrong by simply taking the stance that it cannot be true until they prove it so. Your "prove it" meme is officially dead, and it has been killed by your very own "logical fallacy" meme used against you.

Time to move on, kid.

You fail to grasp the obvious points. Anyone can claim something. Prove it doesn't mean that your claim is false.... it means you must prove your claim to be taken seriously. No one should have any reason to "believe" someone just cause they posted a claim.
How do you not get this? This is really just fundamental logic.

[Heebo]

Guy, please take this to my thread. I'm really close to those 20 pages.

<3

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it means you must prove your claim to be taken seriously.

No, it must not. That's the logical fallacy. You can choose to feign ignorance, but that's your prerogative.

Although in your case, I think it's more actual ignorance and less feigning.