Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:08 PM
Zlain Zlain is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 89
Default

This Colgate guy is a winner. What do you people not understand?
  #2  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:11 PM
Buhbuh Buhbuh is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,638
Default

i think when you only want 30 people to play with, it means you play within your means like any guild should do

you'll have plenty to do in velious

you can skirmish pvp

we'll have 80 and play within our means

that's it
  #3  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:15 PM
Guido Guido is offline
Fire Giant

Guido's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 961
Default

who asked for non classic changes you fuck tard

holy shit you're as dumb as colgate
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by fan D View Post
u are the king
Quote:
Originally Posted by fan D View Post
good lord guido is a monster
  #4  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:17 PM
Littlegyno 13.0 Littlegyno 13.0 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
who asked for non classic changes you fuck tard

holy shit you're as dumb as colgate
asking for 30v30 dragon duels is classic of course. of course you're right andis.

god ur dumb as fuck dude.
  #5  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:29 PM
Colgate Colgate is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I made a thread about GMs guild capping over a year ago...

Everyone de-synced having over 200 players in the same zone / next zone over ...

Agatha is right - either guild cap or update this server.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Either limit guild numbers - guild cap

or update the server to allow zerg v zerg
but ya andis isn't asking for any custom code because he lost at everquest yowl
  #6  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:34 PM
Buhbuh Buhbuh is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,638
Default

yeah it's a tad out outlandish to ask GMs for even numbered fights over raid content, especially 30v30s on the eve of velious

this isn't a blue server and most people don't want more regulation here

i think generally, andis, you want to have the same access/ chance at winning raid content in the game vs. any other guild, and you want that hard-coded and enforced

the problem is that that ignores all the preparation and time people put in to make their guilds stronger/ better suited for the future, and also, in dumber way, it's an entirely disproportionate response or "fix" that's blatantly (or blaytently) aimed at Empire

you guys wanted us to recruit and contest

we did that as the underdogs and took over, we won

now we're the bad guys apparently? we run the guild the exact same as when we formed it

the problem everyone else has is - we're more prepared to fight than any other guild on the server, almost always

you can't look for ways to bypass that and expect results

you can meet us there, though

possibly take your own advice that was given to us at one point, if it's not already too late
  #7  
Old 04-27-2015, 01:06 PM
Slathar Slathar is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buhbuh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yeah it's a tad out outlandish to ask GMs for even numbered fights over raid content, especially 30v30s on the eve of velious

this isn't a blue server and most people don't want more regulation here

i think generally, andis, you want to have the same access/ chance at winning raid content in the game vs. any other guild, and you want that hard-coded and enforced

the problem is that that ignores all the preparation and time people put in to make their guilds stronger/ better suited for the future, and also, in dumber way, it's an entirely disproportionate response or "fix" that's blatantly (or blaytently) aimed at Empire

you guys wanted us to recruit and contest

we did that as the underdogs and took over, we won

now we're the bad guys apparently? we run the guild the exact same as when we formed it

the problem everyone else has is - we're more prepared to fight than any other guild on the server, almost always

you can't look for ways to bypass that and expect results

you can meet us there, though

possibly take your own advice that was given to us at one point, if it's not already too late
i think people will result to training raids with throwaway accounts using mq2
  #8  
Old 04-27-2015, 01:09 PM
derpcake derpcake is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slathar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i think people will result to training raids with throwaway accounts using mq2
prexus will shield us
  #9  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:36 PM
Luniz Luniz is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ( ͡° ͜ʖ͡°)ด้้้้้็็็็
Posts: 167
Default

30 v 30

winner still cant defeat anything in tov/kael

lets move all players to ROFLZEK and we can 10v10 for end game velious mobs
  #10  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:41 PM
Buhbuh Buhbuh is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,638
Default

In fact, I challenge Azrael's best 30 to a fight with our best 30, anything goes.

No bullshit rules, no "only self buffs." Bring everything you've got.

Pick a zone. We'll do it at your guild bind if you want. Pick a day.

Consider it an open challenge.

I'll throw 100k in the pot.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.