Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Raid Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2014, 05:39 PM
Jesseca Jesseca is offline
Aviak

Jesseca's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
We in Taken were still camping our raid force outside of the zones in question. We also have been adhering to the 2 members in the target zone maximum during the window.
Azure Guard has been doing this as well.
__________________
  #2  
Old 02-05-2014, 07:55 PM
Striiker Striiker is offline
Fire Giant

Striiker's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 776
Default

The other option would be for all raid guilds to agree to not camp out in zones with a target pop imminent. I would think that the staff would prefer to see us handle this ourselves rather than have to weigh in on it with rules.

Can we all agree to not camp out in the zone when you intend to go for a target? I think camping out at an adjacent zone is acceptable.
Also, can we all agree to require members present in a zone (actively playing or camped there), when a raid mob pops, to zone out before being involved in an engage?

I think that if we follow these requirements, we are adhering to both the spirit and letter of the no poop sock rules.
__________________
-----------------------
Fearstalker - Enchanter
Guild Leader of <Taken>
-----------------------
  #3  
Old 02-06-2014, 02:26 PM
Kope Kope is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 789
Default

I suggest we make the rule as simple as possible for everyone to understand:

No camping in the zone of a mob you wish to take down, anything outside of the zone is fair game.

I think this would simplify the rule enough to where everyone could understand it, and it would be clear if there were any violations.
  #4  
Old 02-07-2014, 03:58 AM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

Didn't they say KC entrance was fine, as was Seb entrance? I'd assume all the standard zone-ins are fine then, including Ogre Island in TD, between the port spots and TT zoneline in EJ, entrance to SolB/Perma, etc etc.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #5  
Old 02-07-2014, 09:24 AM
Striiker Striiker is offline
Fire Giant

Striiker's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Didn't they say KC entrance was fine, as was Seb entrance? I'd assume all the standard zone-ins are fine then, including Ogre Island in TD, between the port spots and TT zoneline in EJ, entrance to SolB/Perma, etc etc.
The issue is that nobody knows what their ruling is because there's an apparent intentional decision to not provide guidance and clarity here, regardless of how much we all ask. My petition submitted via the forums has been read but unanswered.

Again, I have been of the opinion that, absent clarification from GM's, we should be camping outside of target zones. If there's no response I guess it is safe to camp raid forces inside the zones as guilds are already doing. I just dislike this slow encroachment towards the spawn.. Camping out a little further into the zone allowed? Why camp at the zone line inside the zone.. move raid forces a little closer each time etc. Responses from the staff would solve this and we could move onto the next topic for discussion.
__________________
-----------------------
Fearstalker - Enchanter
Guild Leader of <Taken>
-----------------------
  #6  
Old 02-07-2014, 09:34 AM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

Yeah I don't remember where it was said, but when the rules first came out, they said KC entrance and Seb entrance were fine. Until they say otherwise, I think it is fair to assume that the zone-ins are legit. A few zones merit further clarification. Saying we can't be in the zone is further from what was stated than assuming zone-ins of other zones (besides Seb and KC) are fine.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #7  
Old 02-07-2014, 08:30 AM
getsome getsome is offline
Fire Giant

getsome's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 737
Default

I follow the raid rule as posted by the server staff. If you want to make a side deal, you should be responsible for informing all parties. I was not informed and no one from FE corroborates your version of the conversation about allowing more than 2 people at a spawn point. I do not view following raid rules as policing, it is black and white.

I have problems when rules are broken, and seeing your 6+ pullers at PD was an issue for me. But 6+ pullers at the pd door is not breaking any rules unless those same pullers log on and help on the pd pull when it actually pops.
  #8  
Old 02-16-2014, 05:27 PM
Ella`Ella Ella`Ella is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,273
Default

It's a 7-minute pull from spawn point to ogre island. It takes less time to engage almost any other encounter. Does it really matter if you camp at ogre island or at the docks in Oasis?

These rules don't need to be lawyered, just use common sense.
  #9  
Old 02-16-2014, 05:56 PM
Sadad Sadad is offline
Kobold

Sadad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 164
Default

I'm not trying to lawyer anything. I'm trying to keep my guild from being lawyered in the future. You can't taunt BDA for breaking the rules then chide us for making sure we are working within them.
__________________
Sadad - crusader
Shamwow - oracle
Streetjustice - warlord
  #10  
Old 02-16-2014, 09:40 PM
Sirken Sirken is offline
VIP / Contributor

Sirken's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,822
Default

im going to go ahead and say its allowed, because it really doesnt give an advantage as u still have to find and tag fay and itd be an nightmare to enforce
__________________
Ever wonder what Braknar does around here? - https://youtu.be/WTtFXBgggpI

Sirken's Twitch Stream - www.twitch.tv/sirken_

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard View Post
Accusing me of simultaneous favoritism for two opposing guilds involves a special kind of stupid
Quote:
Originally Posted by karsten View Post
going after sirken is like going to a cheerleader convention and punching the only one that bothered to talk to you
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post
I've met Sirken IRL.. he ain't jelly of shit

Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.