religion

[paulgiamatti]

No, that's called honesty. I don't need to know the intricate details of how evolutionary biology works in order to understand that science is predicated on scrupulous peer review and years of crosschecking.

[Barkingturtle]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The theory that all plants and animals have descended from one primordial germ, is staggering to the mind.

Only if you're a fucking idiot.

Because the theory you put forth isn't held by anyone but fucking idiots.

Life evolved from single-cell organisms.

That does not mean life evolved from the same single-cell organism.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Only if you're a fucking idiot.

Because the theory you put forth isn't held by anyone but fucking idiots.

Life evolved from single-cell organisms.

That does not mean life evolved from the same single-cell organism.

Where did these multiple single-celled organisms come from?

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Only if you're a fucking idiot.

Because the theory you put forth isn't held by anyone but fucking idiots.

Life evolved from single-cell organisms.

That does not mean life evolved from the same single-cell organism.

So how many were there? 2,3,6? If all life on earth , vegetable and animal, shares one thing in common i.e DNA , then how do you know that only one germ or organism wasn't needed?

[Barkingturtle]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where did these multiple single-celled organisms come from?

The stars, duh.

Look, I commend your curiosity, but you have a responsibility to educate yourself. I have no obligation to lead you around by your pudgy little baby hand.

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So how many were there? 2,3,6? If all life on earth , vegetable and animal, shares one thing in common i.e DNA , then how do you know that only one germ or organism wasn't needed?

You're ridiculous. You call it a mind-boggling theory, I tell you it's not actually a theory anyone holds, and then you expect me to defend your ill-conceived hypothetical for you?

I guess that's the kind of circular logic one clings to when they can't make sense of the world around them.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The stars, duh.

Look, I commend your curiosity, but you have a responsibility to educate yourself. I have no obligation to lead you around by your pudgy little baby.

The stars? Please explain how single-cell organisms "came from the stars".

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The stars, duh.

Look, I commend your curiosity, but you have a responsibility to educate yourself. I have no obligation to lead you around by your pudgy little baby hand.



You're ridiculous. You call it a mind-boggling theory, I tell you it's not actually a theory anyone holds, and then you expect me to defend your ill-conceived hypothetical for you?

I guess that's the kind of circular logic one clings to when they can't make sense of the world around them.

Well it was a simple question but ok.

So single cell organisms come from stars? How do they exist in the cold radiation filled death trap of space? And how did they get to earth? Oh wait! Probly a meteor. That's why we see them all the time on meteors now.

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The stars, duh.

Look, I commend your curiosity, but you have a responsibility to educate yourself. I have no obligation to lead you around by your pudgy little baby hand.



You're ridiculous. You call it a mind-boggling theory, I tell you it's not actually a theory anyone holds, and then you expect me to defend your ill-conceived hypothetical for you?

I guess that's the kind of circular logic one clings to when they can't make sense of the world around them.

Btw you can make a reply as soon as you take your foot out of your mouth.
It seems it might just be the new cool theory (again) to believe in the Darwinian model of one common ancestor.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ngle-ancestor/

You really need to keep up with your flip-flopping scientist

[paulgiamatti]

I don't have those numbers, but they're readily available on this vast collection of information we have at our fingertips.

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't have those numbers, but they're readily available on this vast collection of information we have at our fingertips.

You might be interested to know that your claim of religions being responsible for the majority of bloodshed on earth is backed up by the bible. In revelation when John sees the Harlot drunk on the blood of mankind, that is what is meant. False religion, religion that has apostatized from the truth of the bible, has been the driving force behind all major wars on earth.