Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Important > News & Announcements

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-30-2010, 11:04 AM
YendorLootmonkey YendorLootmonkey is offline
Planar Protector

YendorLootmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Surefall Glade
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shannacore [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Uthgaard: NPCs around the world are more festive. Enjoy.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN
DOUBLE COMPLETE RAINBOW! ALL ACROSS THE SKY!!
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:

"You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles
  #2  
Old 10-30-2010, 04:02 AM
Wizerud Wizerud is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 149
Default

Guards should give out no-drop, no-value beer when hailed. That's what SHOULD happen.
  #3  
Old 10-30-2010, 04:02 AM
Akim Akim is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 481
Default

Free beer? I'm game. Drunk enchanter lfg
  #4  
Old 10-30-2010, 04:07 AM
PoeticPixie PoeticPixie is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: MO (I miss CT!)
Posts: 1
Default

=)
  #5  
Old 10-30-2010, 07:33 AM
Aadill Aadill is offline
Planar Protector

Aadill's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,137
Default

Considering that the flying kick for monk seems way overpowered, coupled with the fact that "on live," at least as it was in the kunark and on era, the FD mechanic follows the rule of not always wiping agro upon FD, why are we testing and implementing a mechanic that cannot possibly follow classic sense by using live as the basis? Mend was a 6 minute timer. UIs were specifically made to count the timer on mend. If you could simply zone to refresh it a monk would be at every zone with a train of mobs, soloing. If by "on live" you are referring to classic, I have no knowledge of it as I missed out, but if testing was done with more recent servers then this is most definitely wrong.
  #6  
Old 10-30-2010, 09:45 AM
Lickum Lickum is offline
Sarnak

Lickum's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Yakima, WA
Posts: 214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aadill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Considering that the flying kick for monk seems way overpowered, coupled with the fact that "on live," at least as it was in the kunark and on era, the FD mechanic follows the rule of not always wiping agro upon FD, why are we testing and implementing a mechanic that cannot possibly follow classic sense by using live as the basis? Mend was a 6 minute timer. UIs were specifically made to count the timer on mend. If you could simply zone to refresh it a monk would be at every zone with a train of mobs, soloing. If by "on live" you are referring to classic, I have no knowledge of it as I missed out, but if testing was done with more recent servers then this is most definitely wrong.
Rumor is that monks on this server are the post big nerf monks of the velious era, them soloing is still not gonna be easy. I can see somehow there being abuse though.
__________________
Lickum 51 Troll Shaman
Goldteeth Redshoes 54 Erudite Enchanter
Darkrush 51 Dark Elf Necromancer
Powerful 51 Iksar Monk
  #7  
Old 10-30-2010, 11:59 AM
Haynar Haynar is offline
Developer

Haynar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 2,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aadill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Considering that the flying kick for monk seems way overpowered, coupled with the fact that "on live," at least as it was in the kunark and on era, the FD mechanic follows the rule of not always wiping agro upon FD, why are we testing and implementing a mechanic that cannot possibly follow classic sense by using live as the basis? Mend was a 6 minute timer. UIs were specifically made to count the timer on mend. If you could simply zone to refresh it a monk would be at every zone with a train of mobs, soloing. If by "on live" you are referring to classic, I have no knowledge of it as I missed out, but if testing was done with more recent servers then this is most definitely wrong.
If a mechanic or timer is hard coded into the client, then matching how the client is coded is sometimes best. Especially when it causes desyncs between the server and the client. It is not like mend is terribly overpowered in the first place. How was it in classic? I don't know. But I have no indication that is not how it was. Monks bitched about nerfs louder than any class. I never remember then complaining about a mend nerf.

Haynar
  #8  
Old 10-30-2010, 12:11 PM
Aadill Aadill is offline
Planar Protector

Aadill's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,137
Default

Fight at zone line - end up at 50% hp -> zone out mend to 75 -> zone in mend to 100% The original ability was on a 6 minute timer. I understand the client desyncs; I've seen it do just that, however it would be up to a few seconds off in live as though the client checked with the server to verify if it should be up or not.... With it being client controlled and refresh on zone or even /camp it's defeating the purpose of a timed ability.

Also it was never a nerf; if "in live" it now acts like that, they changed it. I can find posts that allude to the fact that you have to wait for mend to pop up.. no one ever mentions "just zone out and come back!" Surely someone in the first 4 years of EQ would've realized that and had all sorts of monkly advice about mend soloing being the best, but it's not, because that would be far too overpowered to be able to single pull a mob to the zoneline with the no agro mechanic in place, then solo it and zone back out for a complete heal. That defeats the consequences of soloing by removing ALL downtime from the equation.
Last edited by Aadill; 10-30-2010 at 12:23 PM..
  #9  
Old 10-30-2010, 12:34 PM
Haynar Haynar is offline
Developer

Haynar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 2,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aadill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Fight at zone line - end up at 50% hp -> zone out mend to 75 -> zone in mend to 100% The original ability was on a 6 minute timer. I understand the client desyncs; I've seen it do just that, however it would be up to a few seconds off in live as though the client checked with the server to verify if it should be up or not.... With it being client controlled and refresh on zone or even /camp it's defeating the purpose of a timed ability.

Also it was never a nerf; if "in live" it now acts like that, they changed it. I can find posts that allude to the fact that you have to wait for mend to pop up.. no one ever mentions "just zone out and come back!" Surely someone in the first 4 years of EQ would've realized that and had all sorts of monkly advice about mend soloing being the best, but it's not, because that would be far too overpowered to be able to single pull a mob to the zoneline with the no agro mechanic in place, then solo it and zone back out for a complete heal. That defeats the consequences of soloing by removing ALL downtime from the equation.
If Rogean and nilbog want it changed back, because a monk can solo at the zone line better, then rock on. I cannot fix the client/server getting out of sync any other way than how I did it. I did not ask your permission to make the change in the first place.

Maybe I can get eqclassic people to check how the mechanic is coded into the trilogy client? Good grief. Go make your own server if you don't like it here.

You got any evidence that ranger bows should do critical hits in classic? Because that is on my list of things to nerf, that I have been intentionally ignoring.

Whiny whiny whiny.

Time to nerf some stuff, rather than fix things.

Haynar
  #10  
Old 10-31-2010, 10:28 PM
RKromwell RKromwell is offline
Sarnak

RKromwell's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haynar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You got any evidence that ranger bows should do critical hits in classic? Because that is on my list of things to nerf, that I have been intentionally ignoring.

As some one that played a ranger from Beta til the end of my time on live, yes rangers did crits with their bows. At one time, during beta they played with giving all the fighter classes crits. They found it was too over powered for rangers to get crits with normal weapons but they kept them in for bows. Unless you have access to beta patch notes though, I can't prove it.

Edit:

If you have beta patch notes, rangers were given bow crits at the same time Rogues were given the ability to crit with thrown weapons. Which was buffed up, crit chance was too low, sometime just before or after RoK.
__________________
Raell Kromwell
Aei' Desis (R.I.P.)
Xegony
Last edited by RKromwell; 10-31-2010 at 11:18 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.