#31
|
|||
|
Iksar has some advantages over human monks but won't affect you nearly as much as choosing iksar or non-iksar when rolling necromancer. The extra ac and hp regen helps but that's it.
| ||
|
#36
|
|||
|
Pretty sure that's only non-epic where Humans have a better ratio.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will> Manowarr - Druid Blue Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA> Shiroe - 60 Enchanter Manowarr - 60 Druid | ||
|
#37
|
|||
|
both races get 9/16 ratio with epic
| ||
|
#38
|
|||
|
Many high-end monks made their characters before Kunark. Other than that, there is no power gaming reason to pick human. To me, it seems weird to put Sleeper's Tomb robes on human monks....when Kunark was out for 4+ years. But I understand people get sentimental about their characters.
There's a couple posts about Human monks being less common....not really bro. Human and Iksar monks are equally common at level 60. | ||
|
#39
|
|||
|
There is absolutely no doubt at all in any form that Iksar make the better monk from a min/max point of view
That said, I'm probably going to make a human monk | ||
|
#40
|
|||
|
Another reason is you can barely notice the hp regen until you are 51+ where the difference skyrockets. Most people won't be willing to reroll at that point.
| ||
|
|
|