@Menden

[Trollkarlen]

Originally Posted by MavstabYoudead [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

prof it. scumbag had it coming.

Mavstab could very well be the lowest iq nerd on the server. Grown up people trying to have a serious dicussion about server policy and all he can muster is rabid subjective yelling about how "his" side is always right. A child in mind and spirit.

[MavstabYoudead]

Originally Posted by Trollkarlen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mavstab could very well be the lowest iq nerd on the server. Grown up people trying to have a serious dicussion about server policy and all he can muster is rabid subjective yelling about how "his" side is always right. A child in mind and spirit.

Yikes, cringe worthy post for sure. Sorry that you can't comprehend that GMs associate the multitude of complaints/petitions against Brobb and suspend him for his actions. Not like he has a clean whistle....far from it. Sorry logic isn't your thing.

[Ignight]

Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Already confirmed GM said it was for the rapture, please delete this post from the thread moderators. It is misleading.

So if it was just Rapture we can say if Root was used, he would not have been banned? Or attacked in any other way rather than Rapture, is that acceptable? Does this extend to other players that are engaged with NPC's?

Just trying not to get banned here.

[Trollkarlen]

Originally Posted by Ignight [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So if it was just Rapture we can say if Root was used, he would not have been banned? Or attacked in any other way rather than Rapture, is that acceptable? Does this extend to other players that are engaged with NPC's?

Just trying not to get banned here.

To be safe, just run or plug if you are attacked by players with Apex tags. Don't try to make sense of the rules because the problem is entirely with the corrupt enforcement.

[Ignight]

Is there any chance we could get Menden to clarify is thinking around this ruling?

[Videri]

Originally Posted by Ignight [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is there any chance we could get Menden to clarify is thinking around this ruling?

After the rabid accusations against the staff in this thread, I doubt it.

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by Videri [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

After the rabid accusations against the staff in this thread, I doubt it.

The GMs only fess up to their mistakes when they aren't questioned.

[Trollkarlen]

Originally Posted by Videri [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

After the rabid accusations against the staff in this thread, I doubt it.

They don't give a shit about this issue or the health of the red server. Some nerd got a discord message from his bro named Tune, camped his Apex toon and logged on his GM toon. No big conspiracy. Not much to it at all really. Move on.

[Trollkarlen]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm pretty sure the majority of the server agrees this is a dumb rule. A few people will disagree because it got someone they don't like blanket suspended, but eventually things will turn the other way and instead of recanting their stupid philosophy about exp deaths, they will simply stay quiet.

Well meaning argument but in the end flawed. You will never see any apex person suspended with reference to this "rule". The shoe will never be on the other foot. Reasonable ways to agree on common rules breaks down in this situation. Might is right and Apex own the management. Why should they agree to reasonable rules when they know they will never be enforced regarding their actions?

[Jazzy]

This thread could have been made in nihi era

Svr is corrupt, hashtag deal with it