#51
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#52
|
|||
|
Ok i did some testing on 1hb, sorry i lost some buffs mid test, but heres my overall on Bloodmaw, considering hes green low AC doubt we hit that on raid mobs or high AC:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] (also note everytime BoF is Main Hand parse read 7 attempts in the same sec due to fast weap and triple atk) Fist of Nature + Gharns 148.6 DPS Gharns + Fist of Nature 148.4 DPS Baton of Flame + Gharns 139.4 DPS Fist of Nature + Baton of Flame 138.1 DPS Baton of Flame + Fist of Nature 134.3 DPS Gharns + Baton of Flame 124.7 DPS (Bad Lucky? Lost atk buff mid fight) Blam + Gharns 122.6 DPS (Im not sure what to say, also had to cut early he ran) | ||
Last edited by Brocode; 09-11-2019 at 05:44 PM..
|
|
#55
|
||||
|
Quote:
for High ac parses i really do recommend kael. AC there is HIGH but more importantly mobs have insane regen. This allows you to get parse data on the exact same mob by letting it regen.
__________________
| |||
|
#56
|
|||
|
Data from tonight's Drioc session. When taking out proc damage the 2h performed slightly better. Starting to think that the difference between 1h and 2h are not hugely significant anymore.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing Thanks Troxx for the session and helping reduce the variables. | ||
|
#57
|
|||
|
Absolutely man, it was enlightening.
Our methds: -we pulled Drioc to 4-way and kept him malo’d and slowed. -Torpor was only used on Jolav. -All heals on Chillwin were direct blast heals to ensure the slow component from Torp didn’t taint the numbers -buffs on chillwin were only focus stam regen dain ring and 50% shaman haste -no avatar or monk epic click as the possibility keeping of not these up would could taint the numbers -the goal was slow control with all variables identical except weapons equipped -chillwin always attacked from the front even when I was getting beat on -chillwin would attack until 25 then flop and let mob regen up We managed 4 runs with 15/18 and 13/17 and a few more than that with 2hand. As posted, Abashi was 2.5% more dps when procs are excluded (160dd root proc won’t work on most all raid targets). With procs and buffs as is on this mob DW was 4.84% better. As Chillwin had 255 dex, full buffs with call of predator, VoG, avatar, Str of Nature, epic click (full on melee buffs), Abashi would have pulled ahead of DW with procs by a marginal amount. The proc dps would not be influences by further buffs, only the shite damage. As chillwin points out, they’re more or less interchangeable. This has held true for both high ac and low ac. For anyone interested in Parsing; use Kael. The fast regen on these mobs ensures you can use the same mob over and over again to make sure no variables change except that which you want to investigate.
__________________
| ||
Last edited by Troxx; 09-12-2019 at 10:08 AM..
|
|
#58
|
|||
|
Edit: nevermind I was mistaken disregard this post
__________________
| ||
Last edited by Troxx; 09-12-2019 at 10:16 AM..
|
|
#59
|
|||
|
Remember, more ATK/less AC helps 1H now. It's always nice to get empirical confirmation, but it looks like my calculator was spot on: Abashi's will have the edge while raiding, and the various 1H combos will have the edge for XP. But we can definitely agree that it will be close. Of course the best is to have both, but I don't have that kind of DKP!
| ||
|
#60
|
|||
|
Great job troxx!!!
Have you done the same parses with epic/SoS vs. TStaff yet? I would love to see the same parses with a warrior too if you had them. I love the way you tackle these things like a real scientist! | ||
|
|
|