#51
|
|||
|
I wonder if we should see if we should make them pst vs est themed servers before the transfer? just a thought.
| ||
|
#52
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#53
|
|||
|
Uh no that is not at all what would happen if a server was themed to have more active players 3 hours ahead or before the other.
Id be curious if half the population would be interested in that then why not. It would only allow for easier raiding/grouping schedules. But if there isnt a huge PST pop then nbd. But yeesh calm down. | ||
|
#54
|
||||
|
PVP server please. Will take alot of us away.
__________________
The Rushmore Doctrine
Quote:
| |||
|
#55
|
|||
|
| ||
|
#56
|
|||
|
This is a bad idea, in my opinion. Why? Because Green server is capping out around ~2000 to 2500 players. It's not going higher, we've achieved a player count that will never get higher than what it is now and people are spreading out over the world. The population will only decline. And players will continue to spread out and/or fall off as new content is released.
Dear Devs: EverQuest is a *LIMITED* world. It's what makes EverQuest so unique. You cannot appease every... single... player.. People are ALWAYS going to bitch, because its E V E R Q U E S T. Why toy with the server population/community one week into Green launch? You guys have worked 10 years for this. My prediction with Teal server launch: We will see population decrease across all servers. Thats my 2 cents. Happy Hunting out there.
__________________
[ANONYMOUS]
| ||
|
#57
|
|||
|
I count about 8, about the same population as the previously failed PVP server
| ||
|
#58
|
|||
|
I'm hoping they restrict logging onto both from the same IP.
| ||
|
#60
|
|||
|
we are going to end up with 3 servers of 500 people
| ||
|
|
|