![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Here let's do some wizard basic calculations. Let's say quadding from 50-60 in kunark is roughly 50% time gathering killing, and 50% time medding (it will prob take long to gather mobs with all the peeps leveling but for sake of argument).
Jboots give your char 135% speed SoW pots 155% speed SoW pots are 14.8% faster. Now if our time is split 50/50 like above that means you will level 7.4% faster using SoW pots while quadding (since speed doesn't matter while medding). Now time spent casting is not factored in yet so let's say it's 1/3 moving 2/3 not, you will still level 5% faster. Ergo any wiz quad leveling in kunark with jboots will be leveling slower than those with SoW pots. (SoW pots also get slightly faster as you level to 60 so these numbers will be marginally higher) | ||
|
Last edited by Widan; 08-03-2020 at 12:19 PM..
|
|
||
|
#3
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Everything you said here is unfounded, and you're grasping at straws because I destroyed your made-up argument. Please go away, you're embarrassing yourself. | |||||
|
|
||||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
And also why are you unable to use your indoor clickies outdoors thus forcing you to also get outdoor only clickies? And JBoots shouldn't scale past 35 so wrong again there https://lucy.allakhazam.com/spell.ht...74&source=Live | |||
|
Last edited by Widan; 08-03-2020 at 12:55 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, if your SoW fades while you're quadding 4 mobs in a tight circle on a 30x30 space and you don't have jboots, good luck refreshing that potion with a 4.0 second cast time. Raptors in TD anyone? You'd be done... just like this argument. See ya. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
I can see from browsing the version history on the AC list spreadsheet tonight that someone has been deleting it and spamming gibberish/ascii dicks and stuff on it...
While I do take a slight pleasure in seeing it, as it proves my point that the list can be fucked with by any random clown, this is not my handiwork. Immaturity and mayhem is not my goal. /shrug | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
See you in turdgadin ! | |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
By design it can be edited by anyone, just like in-game. Again, it's a tool that's backed up by the limited server enforced rules and player justice. They weren't happy about the defacement and just kept on trucking. Literally 67 people watching it at this very moment. Nothing get past them. There been 4 actual concerning events in it's history. 2 were the same guy inserting himself into list who was tracked down on an alt minutes after and discussed. 3rd was the situation last week when someone wanted to reboot the list (people and support staff were not happy). 4th was the dick. Outside of that there was 2 times people typo'd (put EQ / commands into list) and 2 times people reported to me that Blistig was on the list twice. Told them to go ahead and petition that. haha. Again, working better than I ever anticipated.
__________________
Gefragschlimmer Verheustensteugler - Heyokah of <Kingdom>
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't think I'm alone in my opinion that no camp list in EQ should ever get large enough to require a damn spreadsheet. If you want the camp, sit at the camp and wait your turn. If you have to log off, try again tomorrow. The only rule we need is a prevention of holding the camp to corpse-horde multiple rings if there is a player physically at the camp waiting for a turn. For those concerned that they'll never get a chance without a hokey-pokey google list, I can tell you that these repeated incidents of frustrating vagueness and tom-fuckery surrounding whether or not the list should reset when no one is around proves there are plenty of fair opportunities to take over camp. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|