Sebilis Key

[Danth]

Originally Posted by Naxy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Off topic: so why is it assumed that binding at the Firepots will be put in? Wishful thinking or based on some statement from the devs?

It's assumed firepot bind will be in place because it was available on "Blue." I don't know that P1999 staff wants to deal with the hassle/workload associated with non-soulbound zone keys. We'll see; it'll be interesting if they put it in.

Danth

[Castle2.0]

Does it get patched in shortly?

Does the post-patch situation save a lot of work for GMs/guides?

The choice couldn't be clearer this November: soul-bound keys are in.

[douglas1999]

Binding at the firepots is probably an extremely easy quick thing to patch in\out given the architecture of the game.

[Toad1]

They dont have the ability to not make it soulbound

[Soothsayer]

Ugh... between this key nonsense and the myconid spore king, Sebilis at Kunark launch is going to be the one of the biggest sh*tshows in EQ history. Wake me up in ~11 months when Velious is out.

[mcoy]

Originally Posted by Toad1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They dont have the ability to not make it soulbound

It's literally a flag on the item in the database - quite easy to enable/disable.

-Mcoy

[Zuranthium]

Binding at the firepots is overrated anyway, bind in FV where you can just take a quit boat ride to the firepots, while also having better access to Kunark.