Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

View Poll Results: Will Trump Leave On His own?
Yes 41 36.28%
No 72 63.72%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2020, 01:50 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16,899
Default

Im watching The Barrier on Netflix right now and I'm like, ok this is what the shut-in's are going to be like now oops I was wrong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #2  
Old 11-08-2020, 06:10 PM
Morton Jr Morton Jr is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Im watching The Barrier on Netflix right now and I'm like, ok this is what the shut-in's are going to be like now oops I was wrong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Theres a cool special about scientology , must watch
  #3  
Old 11-08-2020, 03:49 PM
douglas1999 douglas1999 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,436
Default

Here's how I predict it will go:

I will work hard for the american people. The working class. The peoplewhodoit, you know? Cmon. A new directionfor, you, the people man. Healthcare, your doctor, thanksgiving turkey table.

*kamala cackles weirdly when asked any kind of hard question*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iMYlJqsDcg
Last edited by douglas1999; 11-08-2020 at 04:01 PM..
  #4  
Old 11-08-2020, 03:58 PM
douglas1999 douglas1999 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,436
Default

Criticizing or praising trump's covid response is a non-starter. He, personally, didn't do anything. He was surrounded by people who advise him. The general consensus swung back and forth. Democrats initially: Don't ban travel from china, or you're a racist. Democrats later: Why didn't you act sooner?? Fauci initially: Don't wear masks. Fauci later: Definitely wear masks or your lungs will bleed. Then there's a gigantic phish-show style party for biden winning and nobody cares. But rednecks protesting lockdowns in their cars wearing masks is a "super-spreader event". This is why people question the narrative, because it's full of internal contradictions.

Edit: Sorry for double post. God damnit.
  #5  
Old 11-08-2020, 04:20 PM
hobart hobart is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Criticizing or praising trump's covid response is a non-starter. He, personally, didn't do anything. He was surrounded by people who advise him. The general consensus swung back and forth. Democrats initially: Don't ban travel from china, or you're a racist. Democrats later: Why didn't you act sooner?? Fauci initially: Don't wear masks. Fauci later: Definitely wear masks or your lungs will bleed. Then there's a gigantic phish-show style party for biden winning and nobody cares. But rednecks protesting lockdowns in their cars wearing masks is a "super-spreader event". This is why people question the narrative, because it's full of internal contradictions.

Edit: Sorry for double post. God damnit.
Again, covered already.

He ordered the reorganization of the GHSBU prior to COVID. During COVID, he was advised by epidemiologists along the way. He chose to not heed their warnings because he was more concerned about re-election and the stock market. Instead, he shopped until he found someone willing to deliver the advice he wanted to hear.

COVID was a slam-dunk opportunity for Trump to get re-elected. Back in march he could have come before the people and galvanized us like FDR or like Reagan would have. He could have told us it was going to be hard and asked us to step up together and sacrifice. Think Rudy on 9/11. Act like an adult with some humanity and shoot straight with your constituents. The bar is not that high.

But no, he didn't like the message coming from his experts so he did what he's pathologically compelled to do -- go the other direction out of spite and continue to double down over and over once it's clear he made the wrong choice.

A proper response doesn't assure a positive outcome, but that doesn't excuse an improper response.
  #6  
Old 11-08-2020, 06:47 PM
douglas1999 douglas1999 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hobart [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Again, covered already.

He ordered the reorganization of the GHSBU prior to COVID. During COVID, he was advised by epidemiologists along the way. He chose to not heed their warnings because he was more concerned about re-election and the stock market. Instead, he shopped until he found someone willing to deliver the advice he wanted to hear.

COVID was a slam-dunk opportunity for Trump to get re-elected. Back in march he could have come before the people and galvanized us like FDR or like Reagan would have. He could have told us it was going to be hard and asked us to step up together and sacrifice. Think Rudy on 9/11. Act like an adult with some humanity and shoot straight with your constituents. The bar is not that high.

But no, he didn't like the message coming from his experts so he did what he's pathologically compelled to do -- go the other direction out of spite and continue to double down over and over once it's clear he made the wrong choice.

A proper response doesn't assure a positive outcome, but that doesn't excuse an improper response.
Define improper response, or proper response. "Do everything correctly" isn't an argument. Based on what we have learned, covid is still highly non-fatal. a 95% survival rate for the most vulnerable group (the elderly) does not warrant the response that has been deployed, and especially not the consequences of the measures that have been enacted. Nobody has been able to explain, still, why we shouldn't just socially distance and wear masks at all times, for everything, based on this logic. The common cold is more fatal, influenza is more fatal, ebola is more fatal, chicken pox and shingles are more fatal.
  #7  
Old 11-08-2020, 09:49 PM
hobart hobart is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Define improper response, or proper response. "Do everything correctly" isn't an argument. Based on what we have learned, covid is still highly non-fatal. a 95% survival rate for the most vulnerable group (the elderly) does not warrant the response that has been deployed, and especially not the consequences of the measures that have been enacted. Nobody has been able to explain, still, why we shouldn't just socially distance and wear masks at all times, for everything, based on this logic. The common cold is more fatal, influenza is more fatal, ebola is more fatal, chicken pox and shingles are more fatal.
Listen to epidemiologists and other infectious disease specialists.

They don't recommend wearing masks for the cold or influenza (most). Just because they haven't been able to explain it to your liking doesn't mean it hasn't been explained. It's a combination of mortality, R0, and other factors. If we didn't have vaccines that were at least partially effective for some flus, we might be asked to wear masks more.

This trend in our society to give credence to our layman's logic and information we read on facebook over that of the experts is an alarming trend that is, almost, uniquely American in origin.

I'll recommend the following read again to anyone who doesn't think they know everything: https://www.amazon.com/Death-Experti...4886392&sr=8-1
  #8  
Old 11-08-2020, 10:06 PM
Woke Locc Woke Locc is offline
Planar Protector

Woke Locc's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 1,010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hobart [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just because they haven't been able to explain it to your liking doesn't mean it hasn't been explained. It's a combination of mortality, R0, and other factors. If we didn't have vaccines that were at least partially effective for some flus, we might be asked to wear masks more.

This trend in our society to give credence to our layman's logic and information we read on facebook over that of the experts is an alarming trend that is, almost, uniquely American in origin.
The infinite 'why' game is really irritating if you aren't the child's parent.
  #9  
Old 11-08-2020, 04:02 PM
Baler Baler is offline
Planar Protector

Baler's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 9,523
Default

Will biden "abuse his power" and start signing executive orders?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order

Will they use the 25th amendment to replace biden?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty...s_Constitution
__________________
  #10  
Old 11-08-2020, 04:26 PM
hobart hobart is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Will biden "abuse his power" and start signing executive orders?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order

Will they use the 25th amendment to replace biden?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty...s_Constitution
Almost certainly, yes. Thank Dick Cheney. Dubya did it. Obama did it. I think every president will until one of the other two branches steps in and checks this power.

No. A speech impediment and being old is not grounds. Could it get there? Sure. I think Trump was too old to be elected president. Biden obviously older, so yeah. Maybe?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.