![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
If you didn't sense the sarcasm, this /tack hammer's for you.
Sometimes I smoke a doob so I can eat more bluebies. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Has to be community driven/enforced. Don't force the GMs to become babysitters.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
What are rules for intentional xp loss? Root someone, pull mobs to them, gate/fd or whatever. Especially on bind points and CRs...
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
was wondering something, what everyone thinks of making it so the only bind point possible are towns, for everyclass?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
What would that even accomplish? | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
I'm too old for a babysitter.
No GM intervention. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
You may not need a babysitter, but I assure you many do. I think I want more of the walk through the house and you just want a phone call to "check up on things" - aka time to bullshit your ass off that you're not throwing the party that is raging in the other room. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Doesn't take a prophet to predict that training causes huge problems. I don't see what positive points there are to allowing training, except that it'll take less GM administration. Since PvP itself will solve 90% of what the GMs have had to waste their time with on p99, I think they'll have time to deal with large-scale training on red99. The no-training rule itself will keep training down to a manageable level by merit of the rule alone, and then they can investigate serious training incidents where people can provide fraps proof and such. They won't have to step in when one guy trains two orc centurions on a group in Crushbone.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|