Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-04-2011, 02:35 AM
Xareth Xareth is offline
Kobold

Xareth's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 153
Default

If you didn't sense the sarcasm, this /tack hammer's for you.

Sometimes I smoke a doob so I can eat more bluebies.
  #2  
Old 09-04-2011, 08:44 PM
Kelsar Kelsar is offline
Sarnak

Kelsar's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 229
Default

Has to be community driven/enforced. Don't force the GMs to become babysitters.
  #3  
Old 09-13-2011, 04:49 PM
JayDee JayDee is offline
Planar Protector

JayDee's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelsar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Has to be community driven/enforced. Don't force the GMs to become babysitters.
lolololololol
__________________
  #4  
Old 09-13-2011, 04:26 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

What are rules for intentional xp loss? Root someone, pull mobs to them, gate/fd or whatever. Especially on bind points and CRs...
  #5  
Old 09-14-2011, 04:09 PM
Civeal Civeal is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 23
Default

was wondering something, what everyone thinks of making it so the only bind point possible are towns, for everyclass?
  #6  
Old 09-14-2011, 04:39 PM
greatdane greatdane is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Civeal
was wondering something, what everyone thinks of making it so the only bind point possible are towns, for everyclass?
No. None of those gameplay-changing features. Anything that doesn't pertain specifically to the actual PvP ruleset should remain classic.

What would that even accomplish?
  #7  
Old 09-15-2011, 01:40 AM
Civeal Civeal is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greatdane [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No. None of those gameplay-changing features. Anything that doesn't pertain specifically to the actual PvP ruleset should remain classic.

What would that even accomplish?
i was thinking it would prevent bindrushing in a very strong manner.
  #8  
Old 09-14-2011, 09:53 PM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

I'm too old for a babysitter.

No GM intervention.
  #9  
Old 09-14-2011, 10:06 PM
Xareth Xareth is offline
Kobold

Xareth's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm too old for a babysitter.

No GM intervention.
Yeah leave the kids at home by themselves, they'll never get into any trouble...

You may not need a babysitter, but I assure you many do. I think I want more of the walk through the house and you just want a phone call to "check up on things" - aka time to bullshit your ass off that you're not throwing the party that is raging in the other room.
  #10  
Old 09-15-2011, 12:47 PM
greatdane greatdane is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 682
Default

Doesn't take a prophet to predict that training causes huge problems. I don't see what positive points there are to allowing training, except that it'll take less GM administration. Since PvP itself will solve 90% of what the GMs have had to waste their time with on p99, I think they'll have time to deal with large-scale training on red99. The no-training rule itself will keep training down to a manageable level by merit of the rule alone, and then they can investigate serious training incidents where people can provide fraps proof and such. They won't have to step in when one guy trains two orc centurions on a group in Crushbone.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.