Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2011, 01:18 PM
Softcore PK Softcore PK is offline
Planar Protector

Softcore PK's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Red99
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the governing rule on RZ live wasn't training, but moreso clear and intentional XP loss.
This makes a lot of sense.
__________________
“Smile, breathe, and go slowly.”
  #2  
Old 10-05-2011, 01:49 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Any time mobs become involved in PvP, there will be screams for bans and people that are banned/leave/accuse GM favoritism on a pvp server.

The no training rule exists on live and people don't seem to be getting away with it in cases that aren't grey areas or accidents.
  #3  
Old 10-11-2011, 06:04 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

less rules the better, training always has and always will be part of eq pvp regardless of the rules (wasnt allowed on rz)

problem is that usually the guy retaliating is the one caught and punished, an SZ anything goes ruleset is the best.

if someone binds next to a spawn im trying to camp/xp on what am i supposed to do? kill him then let him med up and shit on my face because killing him again is against the rules?

the only rules should be no third party programs, simplifies the workload and keeps things fair.
  #4  
Old 10-11-2011, 08:50 AM
Billbike Billbike is offline
Sarnak

Billbike's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 357
Default

Policing training is like policing marijuana. Seems good on paper, but in practice it fails.
__________________
Greattaste, Halfling Druid
  #5  
Old 10-11-2011, 07:54 PM
lethdar lethdar is offline
Fire Giant

lethdar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billbike [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Policing training is like policing marijuana. Seems good on paper, but in practice it fails.
What a fail analogy.
  #6  
Old 10-12-2011, 08:32 AM
Billbike Billbike is offline
Sarnak

Billbike's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lethdar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What a fail analogy.
Training will happen everyday. If training is policed, GMs will be overwhelmed with QQ allday everyday. People will be falsely accused and punished. GMs will be accused of favoritism. It will be a huge waste of resources, like what I said in my analogy.
__________________
Greattaste, Halfling Druid
  #7  
Old 10-12-2011, 11:47 AM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lethdar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What a fail analogy.
Heard your guild got griefed off the server...

http://youtu.be/_6wzsIh93qc

Lethdar, the guy that doesnt want trains... cause he could never camp pixels. The guy that doesnt want pumice, so he can camp Golem wands.

U sound blue homie. I got a 54 warrior on P99 and can prolly get you into TMO if you wanna do it up.
  #8  
Old 10-11-2011, 12:13 PM
Softcore PK Softcore PK is offline
Planar Protector

Softcore PK's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Red99
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
less rules the better, training always has and always will be part of eq pvp regardless of the rules (wasnt allowed on rz)

problem is that usually the guy retaliating is the one caught and punished, an SZ anything goes ruleset is the best.

if someone binds next to a spawn im trying to camp/xp on what am i supposed to do? kill him then let him med up and shit on my face because killing him again is against the rules?

the only rules should be no third party programs, simplifies the workload and keeps things fair.
In this case, bindpoint camping should not be an issue. You'd be hard pressed to find a GM that would take action against you for this (hopefully).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billbike [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Policing training is like policing marijuana. Seems good on paper, but in practice it fails.
:/

Marijuana is a victimless crime, training is not. Not a very good comparison.
__________________
“Smile, breathe, and go slowly.”
  #9  
Old 10-11-2011, 12:18 PM
Lovely Lovely is offline
Fire Giant

Lovely's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 828
Default

No one seem to give a flying shit about the training rules on beta. Everytime you head to lguk for pvp there are trains all over the place
  #10  
Old 10-11-2011, 08:14 PM
juicedsixfo juicedsixfo is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovely [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No one seem to give a flying shit about the training rules on beta. Everytime you head to lguk for pvp there are trains all over the place
Lets use some common sense here. The GMs aren't going to bother with 200 petitions a day from guk, unrest, etc.

The training rule will come in to play when a guild petitions that they were forming up to engage a boss mob, and one bard from an opposing guild zoned in and wiped them. The GMs can check the log, verify, and bam – you're done. That's what the rule is for primarily. It's not for zone battle bullshit. Though, if you bring all of guk with you to Lord room and FD as a monk on top of a group, I'm sure that will be grounds as well. Rule No. 1 – If you get trained, take screenshots, post it, see what happens, deal with it.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.