PvP Range

[Xareth]

Originally Posted by Softcore PK [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Have you read my posts in this thread?

I can't remember persay, but I have read enough of your posts to righteously assume where you stand on this issue.

Originally Posted by Macken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

+10

Yeah that way a max rogue could backstab a naked lvl 40 cloth class for triple digits!










maybe

[Macken]

what's your point?

[Billbike]

PvP range needs to increase, not decrease.[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Kain]

4-5 sub 30. Let people get in to the groove a bit easier.

5 levels is a huge difference in lower lvl pvp.

l1ch- "you should just remove level restrictions really - Vanilla WoW PvP anyone?"

I recall when I first tried Live Pvp in classic, it involved me getting repeatedly spawn camped by a lvl 50 bard.
It didn't even make me mad, but I wondered if the bard was giggling irl while imagining me hitting the keyboard. Was kind of stupid.

[Glam]

+/-5 is even that high at lvl 50.

8 lvl is crazy, what can a lvl 42 do about a lvl 50 with spell 44 and 49/50 and he using lvl 39-40????

thats just EZmode kill

[Billbike]

Originally Posted by Glam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

+/-5 is even that high at lvl 50.

8 lvl is crazy, what can a lvl 42 do about a lvl 50 with spell 44 and 49/50 and he using lvl 39-40????

thats just EZmode kill

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where do they come from?

Have you EVER played PVP enabled Everquest before?

Edit: I am elated to see players from the blue server and even other games showing interest in r99. I do worry about these foreign players imposing their inexperienced theory of how Everquest PvP mechanics should function on to r99.

It's like a bunch of virgins trying to direct a porno.

Anyone with real PvP experience knows we need atleast +-8 levels at max level.

[vinx]

Originally Posted by Glam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

+/-5 is even that high at lvl 50.

8 lvl is crazy, what can a lvl 42 do about a lvl 50 with spell 44 and 49/50 and he using lvl 39-40????

thats just EZmode kill

sure its tough from 40-50 prolly more so at the 40ish level
then it gets somewhat easier at 44+
but once you breach 50+ and start raiding well ya, your gonna want as much an open range as you possibly can,
so you an yours can accomplish things w/o immortals

1-20 can be tough or easy, low spells/resists/HP
20-40 = everything here is just for fun experience, and the reason some like the mid range pvp where for the most part,
things are somewhat balanced (gear and resists even on the occasional twink)
40-50 tough versus raid players, but worth it and needed at endgame

-/+ 8 levels really does solve more problems then a -/+5 in the endgame

[Tombom]

^^^ amen

[hilelorangutan]

Yeah I totally agree, I think a 8 level split is insane at any level in Everquest, in a more recent mmo its more feasible, but two whole spell levels apart is MASSIVE in EQ. Please go with something more like 4-5 +/-

[Tombom]

Originally Posted by hilelorangutan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah I totally agree, I think a 8 level split is insane at any level in Everquest, in a more recent mmo its more feasible, but two whole spell levels apart is MASSIVE in EQ. Please go with something more like 4-5 +/-

your vagina is showing