![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Assuming the Velious spdat was from live, it would've been far more accurate to have used that and reconciled Kunark-era differences with archived evidence than to implement beta data that obviously never went live.
| ||
|
#2
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I find myself agreeing with Ruprecht. Can anyone give me any examples of player spells that changed between kunark and velious? (and no, not by using that kunark beta spdat) With the devotion many people had to their particular class, spell "nerfs" would of sent shockwaves through the fan site community. Where are they? | ||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
So much code for these changes bud
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Divine Barrier removes natureskin line because of the regen.
I dont think it should. | ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
I have no idea about DB -- back in 2002 the regeneration in slot4 was changed to a heal instead.
But here's the thing: Skin like nature and natureskin do not have a slot4, the regeneration component was on slot5. So it should stack and these spells should be fixed. | ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
I'd use Velious sp.dat and patch notes from there for stacking.
| ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
You get like no information about stacking on these patch notes and the 2002-03 is when they started using lucy.
everything in between release and then is next to impossible to "prove". | ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Impossible eh
| ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Impossibru
BumP | ||
|
#10
|
||||
|
pillars and rains without range change is impossibru to prove unclassic which means shit's classic
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Quote:
Wipe it clean. | |||
![]() |
|
|