Aradune Returns to EQlive

[Visual]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

After the way he jumped ship on VSoH

That game was so bad

[Rhambuk]

how many donations would we need to get him on the p99 staff, not that our staff isnt way better but no more of this waybackmachine. Just ask the man who made it

[maximum]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

how many donations would we need to get him on the p99 staff...

Click the ads.

[Hollywood]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

how many donations would we need to get him on the p99 staff, not that our staff isnt way better but no more of this waybackmachine. Just ask the man who made it

I'm really surprised he hasn't (that we're aware of..) been in touch with (or maybe he has) the P99 staff.

Then again if he was, I suspect a lot of things would be fixed and we'd be on Velious so..

Originally Posted by Nubben [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Very nice read, thanks for sharing. It really makes me want to give Vanguard a try. I did download it a few months ago and created a FTP account but I only played for about a half hour. At that point I had too much going on to really get into a new MMO, but I still have it installed on my computer. Is it playable at all in short sessions (30 minutes to 2 hours or so) as a casual player?

You can most certainly get into the swing of things within a few hours. As for whether you can jump on for half an hour and log off feeling a sense of accomplishment - no, it's still got an old school style flavor/system.
If it's any reference, it's very much like EQII. If you can give Vanguard a week or so, you may really be into it and start to notice the variances that make it a bit better than EQII.

Should you be looking for the more in and out style for casual players, Guild Wars 2 would be better.

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Visual [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That game was so bad

No, it was unfinished.

[webrunner5]

Unfinished true. But the graphics were just first rate.

[RelivingNorrath]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, it was unfinished.

^^

I agree. The game is bad =/= the game was unfinished. It's interesting how many people can't seem to appreciate the difference.

I will say though, the decisions they made concerning the character models (identical human bodies w/ animal heads, universal animations for every race, etc.) was a mistake that I'm not sure they could have recovered from. So much of the game's character and potential was lost to that one horrible design decision.

Just my personal opinion.

[SCB]

http://i.imgur.com/h5P6RLS.gif

This just made that thread for me.